Asmawi Asmawi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bahtsul Masā'il as a Model of Collective Ijtihad in Traditional Islam: An Epistemological and Methodological Analysis of the Mudzakarah Ma'al-Ikhwan Forum Imam Syarbini; Asmawi Asmawi; Kojin Kojin
Education and Sociedad Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Al-Qalam Institue

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61987/edsojou.v3i2.2639

Abstract

This study aims to examine Bahtsul Masā'il as a model of traditional Islamic collective ijtihād by analyzing the epistemological foundations and methodological practices of the Ma'al-Ikhwan Mudzakarah Forum at Salafiyah-Syafi'iyah Islamic Boarding School, Sukorejo, East Java, Indonesia. The research employed a qualitative case study design involving participant observation, semi-structured interviews with kiai, forum leaders, musahhih, teachers, and senior students, as well as document analysis of forum proceedings and legal decisions. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, while data credibility was ensured through source triangulation, method triangulation, and member checking. The findings reveal that the forum develops an integrative model of collective ijtihād by combining classical Islamic legal sources (kutub al-turāth), uṣūl al-fiqh, qawā'id fiqhiyyah, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, and contextual analysis within a structured deliberative process. The study also demonstrates that methodological contestation functions as a constructive mechanism for strengthening legal reasoning rather than generating institutional conflict. It concludes that Bahtsul Masā'il serves not only as a forum for legal decision-making but also as an educational model for cultivating critical reasoning, collaborative scholarship, and methodological competence among pesantren scholars. These findings contribute to the development of Islamic legal studies and offer a conceptual framework for strengthening collective ijtihād in responding to contemporary challenges within Islamic educational institutions.
Pernikahan sebagai Instrumen Kekuasaan dan Status Sosial: Studi Historis tentang Praktik Perkawinan di Kalangan Ménak Sunda Pujo Pangestu; Asmawi Asmawi; Ahmad Muhtadi Anshor
FASTABIQ: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): FASTABIQ: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47281/fas.v6i2.248

Abstract

This study aims to analyze marriage practices among the Sundanese aristocracy (ménak) during the pre-independence period of Indonesia, focusing on their relationship to social status, power, and wealth. The research explores socio-economic motivations underlying marriage practices that often transcended love or religious devotion, functioning instead as instruments for consolidating authority and sustaining elite lineage. The study employs a library research method with content and descriptive analysis approaches. Data were collected from historical literature, customary law sources, and anthropological studies, and were validated through corroboration analysis by comparing data across multiple references. The findings reveal that marriages among the Sundanese nobles served as strategic tools for preserving noble bloodlines, strengthening political alliances, and maintaining family power and economic stability. Practices such as early arranged marriages, polygamy, and politically motivated unions were integral to this socio-cultural system. Culturally, marriage symbolized honor and the legitimization of social hierarchy within traditional Sundanese society. The study recommends further research on the evolution of marriage values and practices among contemporary Sundanese communities within the framework of modernity and gender.