Nida Hasanati
Master of Psychology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Psychological well-being among Working Women: A Systematic Review Dewita Nur Wulandari; Tulus Winarsunu; Nida Hasanati
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2548

Abstract

Working adult women face multiple role demands that may affect their psychological well-being. This systematic review aims to examine factors influencing Psychological well-being among working women using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach guided by PRISMA. The literature search identified 302 articles, which were screened to obtain 21 eligible studies. The findings indicate that Psychological well-being is influenced by individual factors (self-compassion and resilience), work-related factors (workload, job satisfaction, and organizational support), as well as social and contextual factors (social support, work-life balance, and changes in work systems). This finding confirms that the Psychological well-being of working women is a multidimensional construct that is influenced by the interaction of internal and external factors, thus requiring an integrative approach in efforts to improve psychological well-being.
Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological-Behavioral Responses After Selection Failure: A Systematic Literature Review Pradika Kurniawan; Nida Hasanati
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.2597

Abstract

Selection failure in educational, occupational, training, and certification settings is an evaluative event that may trigger psychological distress, self-doubt, avoidance tendencies, and reconsideration of future plans. Yet these responses cannot be explained solely by the difficulty of the selection process; they are also shaped by how individuals evaluate the meaning of the event and the resources available to cope with it. This systematic review maps the cognitive appraisal components most consistently examined, especially primary appraisal of threat, challenge, harm/loss, and benefit, as well as secondary appraisal of perceived control and self-efficacy, and explains their links with post-failure psychological and behavioral responses. Following PRISMA 2020 principles, 500 records were identified, 62 full-text articles were assessed, and 12 studies were included in the core synthesis. The findings show that threat-dominant appraisal and low perceived control are more consistently associated with psychological distress, avoidance coping, and lower persistence. In contrast, challenge/benefit appraisal and stronger secondary appraisal tend to relate to more constructive coping, adaptive performance, and greater readiness to reattempt. These findings underline cognitive appraisal as a key mechanism for understanding post-selection-failure responses.