Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Abdul Fattaah
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Epistemology of Ijtihad Irsyadi in Fatwas: A Deconstruction of Takhrij Mażhabi through Case Studies of the Lirboyo Fatwa Council Muhammad Ibtihajuddin; Abdul Fattaah; Moch. Nurcholis; Zakka Asvi Auful Shohi Muhammad
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 7 No. 2 November 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v7i02.12412

Abstract

The rigidity of the takhrīj mażhabi methodology in pesantren fatwa traditions necessitates a new epistemological approach that is more responsive to contemporary realities. This study aims to explore ijtihād irsyādi as a methodological alternative that maintains continuity with classical tradition while enabling contextual creativity grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. Employing a qualitative-descriptive-analytical-exploratory approach and a case study method focused on the fatwas of the Lajnah Bahtsul Masail (LBM) Lirboyo from 2019 to 2024, the analysis reveals significant epistemological transformation in istinbath structures. Key findings demonstrate that ijtihād irsyadī prioritizes maslahat (public interest), referential flexibility, and social interpretation as legal foundations, replacing the deductive-formalistic patterns of madhhab-based takhrīj. This approach reinterprets classical authority through maqāṣid frameworks without negating its legitimacy, as evidenced in the 2023 BPJS Healthcare fatwa that teleologically reconstructs social insurance concepts via taḥrīr al-mafhūm (conceptual liberation), tanqīḥ al-manāṭ (ratio legis purification), and ta'līl maqāṣidī (teleological justification). The novelty lies in articulating an adaptive, integrative fatwa epistemology that proactively engages temporal dynamics, offering a reformative paradigm for Indonesian pesantren fatwa methodologies and a substantive contribution to renewing contemporary Islamic legal thought.
Reconstruction Of Asset Confiscation Through the Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture Reviewed In Maslahah Mursalah Khairatul Anisa; Abdul Fattaah
JURNAL ILMU SYARIAH Vol 14 No 1 (2026): Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/mizan.v14i1.23752

Abstract

Abstract Efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia have so far been less than optimal because they have focused solely on prosecuting perpetrators and have paid insufficient attention to recovering losses to the state. The Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) mechanism, as outlined in the draft asset forfeiture law, is a regulatory framework designed to facilitate the recovery of state funds and the eradication of corruption. The objectives of this study are, first, to explain the draft asset forfeiture law and its Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture mechanism. Second, to examine the public interest from the perspective of Islamic law regarding asset recovery through the Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) mechanism and to analyze the implementation of NCB in countries that have adopted it, so that regulations in Indonesia do not focus solely on punishing perpetrators but also on recovering state financial losses, assess their public interest, and ensure they do not conflict with the values of Islamic law. The results of this study indicate that the application of NCB in the Asset Forfeiture Bill does not conflict with the concept of al-bara’ah al-ashliyyah (the presumption of innocence), does not pose a risk of violating human rights, and does not violate the principle of hifz mal. Keywords: Corruption; Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB); benefit
Co-Authors Khairatul Anisa Moch. Nurcholis Muhammad Ibtihajuddin Zakka Asvi Auful Shohi Muhammad