Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Soccer Supporters in Riots at Gelora Joko Samudro Stadium in Gresik Qalbi Alif Syah Putra; Deni Setiyawan
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.9760

Abstract

The research discussed the legal protection for supporters who became victims at Gelora Joko Ocean Stadium by treating supporters as legal subjects in sports activities. This research aims to analyze the legal protections provided by legislation, the responsibilities of officials, the safety of supporters, including matches and clubs, and the obstacles to their implementation. The method used is a jurisdictional research approach, drawing on legislation, cases, empirical studies, and conceptual work. Data were obtained through interviews, field observations, and documentation of legislation and related legal documents. Research results indicate that legal protection for supporters is provided in the Act and the Book of Criminal Law, but implementation remains suboptimal. Weak law enforcement, lack of coordination between parties, lack of law, officials, and clubs in running responsibility, and the club in running responsibility for supporters. This research concluded that the legal protection for supporters is still adequate, although Law Number 11 years has given support and participation to the coordination and participation in the coordination.
The Terrorism Death Penalty Controversy in Indonesia from the Perspective of Law and Human Rights Ikhlashul Amal Kharisma; Deni Setiyawan
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8556

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the application of the death penalty for terrorism-related crimes in Indonesia from the perspectives of criminal law and human rights. The primary focus is to assess whether capital punishment can be justified as a proportionate law enforcement instrument while remaining consistent with the protection of the right to life as a non-derogable right. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches to examine national legal provisions, judicial decisions, and contemporary theories of punishment in conjunction with international human rights standards. The findings indicate that the death penalty retains juridical legitimacy within Indonesia's positive legal system, particularly following the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, which introduces a conditional death penalty framework. Nevertheless, the justification of capital punishment based on deterrence theory lacks strong empirical support and raises serious concerns regarding proportionality and the protection of the right to life. This study recommends that the death penalty be strictly positioned as an ultimum remedium, applied in a highly selective manner with rigorous due process guarantees, and complemented by non-penal counterterrorism strategies emphasizing prevention, deradicalization, and a more humane justice-oriented approach.