Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Tarmizi Tarmizi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Religion Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hadith Commentary on Popular Islamic Website in Indonesia: Methodology, Discursive, and Social Practices Tarmizi Tarmizi; Ayu Ariska; Muhammad Fajri; Sukiyat Sukiyat
Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/mashdar.v7i2.12670

Abstract

This study examines the methodology of hadith commentary on two prominent Indonesian Islamic websites: hadispedia.id and markazsunnah.com, and analyses the discursive and social practices embedded within such commentary, employing Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis (CDA) as its analytical framework. Using a qualitative approach that integrates purposive content analysis, classical hadith commentary methodology (tahlili–ijmali–muqarin typology), and Fairclough's three-level CDA model (text, discursive practice, social practice), the study identifies distinct and internally coherent methodological tendencies at each platform. Hadispedia.id applies the tahlili (analytical) method for hadith on legal themes and the ijmali (synoptic) method for hadith on ethics, consistently contextualising commentary in accessible language suited to a diverse, multi-platform readership. Markazsunnah.com applies the tahlili method consistently across all themes, drawing on classical commentary sources in a systematic scholarly structure suited to a scholarly-oriented readership. At the level of discursive practice, differences in the institutional backgrounds of site administrators, digital distribution ecologies, and modes of reader engagement are shown to shape methodological choices and presentational styles. At the level of social practice, digital hadith commentary serves as a tool for sharing Islamic teachings, promoting mainstream Islamic beliefs, negotiating academic authority in the online religious space, and building social connections through regular interaction with audiences. The study finds that digital hadith commentary is not a neutral platform; instead, it actively influences the way hadith scholarship is understood and creates idealised views of the Muslim audience. This study advances the literature on contemporary hadith scholarship by offering an integrated analytical procedure bridging classical Islamic methodology and CDA to illuminate the socio-religious implications of digital hadith dissemination.
Re-reading of the Concept of Naskh and Mansukh According to Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid and Its Implications for the Interpretation of the Qur’an Muhammad Fajri; Suheri Suheri; Tarmizi Tarmizi
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.3418

Abstract

This article discusses the reconstruction of one of the fundamental concepts in ‘ulumul Qur’an, namely the theory of nasikh-mansukh, which has long been regarded by some classical scholars as definitive and unchanging. One of the figures undertaking this reconstruction is Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd. Nasr Hamid’s reconstruction of the concept of nasikh-mansukh is a response to the ongoing debate between groups that accept and those that reject the existence of nasikh-mansukh in the Qur’an. According to Nasr Hamid, one of the factors causing this debate is the interpretation of naskh as the abrogation or cancellation of a verse. For Nasr Hamid, such a meaning fails to reflect the universal nature of the Qur’an. The primary focus of the concept of naskh-mansukh, which also serves as a determining variable, as proposed by Nasr Hamid, lies in the aspect of context (siyaq). He argues that in determining which verses are naskh and which are mansukh, one should not rely on the chronological order of the verses’ revelation, but must instead consider the contextual analysis of the situation in which the verse was revealed. This is based on the assumption that every verse of the Qur’an was revealed within a socio-cultural context relevant to the needs of society at that time. Therefore, he interprets naskh not as abrogation or revocation, but rather as the replacement (ibdal) of one verse with another, which occurs due to changes in circumstances and conditions that cause the application of that verse to be temporarily suspended until it is reintroduced in accordance with the prevailing conditions.
Co-Authors Ayu Ariska Muhammad Fajri Muhammad Fajri Suheri Suheri Sukiyat Sukiyat