Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Marsha Merlina Hakim
Universitas Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Inconsistency of Court Decisions on Legality of Yogyakarta No.68/KEP/2015 Governor Decree and Compliance Marsha Merlina Hakim; Mahendra Wardhana
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.832

Abstract

The dispute over the location determination for Kulon Progo Airport under the Governor of DIY Decree No. 68/KEP/2015 exposes not merely judicial inconsistency among the Administrative Court (PTUN), the Administrative High Court, and the Supreme Court, but a deeper doctrinal ambiguity in Indonesian administrative law. This article argues that the core issue is not simply whether the decree fulfills the criteria of a State Administrative Decision (KTUN), but the absence of a coherent framework to assess administrative acts with both regulatory and individual characteristics. By analyzing the divergent rulings, this study demonstrates that the Supreme Court’s decision constitutes a critical doctrinal shift. It redefines location determination as a justiciable KTUN and introduces a stricter standard of review that integrates formal legality with substantive compliance, particularly alignment with the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW). The article’s main contribution lies in proposing the concept of “hybrid administrative decisions” to better capture the legal nature of such decrees. This conceptualization not only clarifies the object of administrative disputes but also strengthens judicial control over land acquisition policies. Ultimately, the study highlights the need for clearer legislative guidance to prevent future interpretative disparities and ensure stronger protection of citizens’ land rights.
Co-Authors Mahendra Wardhana