Gunaldi Ahmad
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bisnis Syariah, Sengketa Perdata dan Tindak Pidana Gunaldi Ahmad; Uus Syaripudin
Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 16 No. 02 (2024): Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Prodi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59833/9jbsgg26

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of sharia business practices with civil disputes and criminal acts in Islamic banking. It examines legal challenges arising from late repayments, fraudulent contracts, and criminal offenses related to sharia financial transactions. Using a qualitative method with statutory, juridical, and historical approaches, this study draws upon primary legal sources including decisions from religious courts, appellate rulings, cassation decisions, and Law No. 21 of 2008 on Sharia Banking. Secondary sources include books, journal articles, and other regulatory documents. The findings of this study indicate that sharia business must adhere to principles such as transparency, fairness, and halal compliance. Furthermore, disputes in sharia business are increasingly adjudicated through religious courts, while criminal violations are prosecuted under specific provisions in the Sharia Banking Law. The paper underscores the importance of legal safeguards to support the rapid growth of sharia-based financial institutions in Indonesia.
Justice Collaborator: A Legal Phenomenon Study in the Perspective of Criminal Law and Islamic Jurisprudence Gunaldi Ahmad; Fitri Mustafa; Munir Waspada; Amita Diananda
Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : STAI Publisistik Thawalib Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54150/alirsyad.v5i1.1074

Abstract

This research strengthens justice collaborator policies by integrating maqasid al-shariah values into legal protection and criminal justice practices. This research analyzes justice collaborators in Indonesian and Islamic law, examining alignment with maqasid, legal protection, and social impacts. This study employs qualitative library research with comparative-interdisciplinary approaches, drawing on documentation, interviews, observations, content analysis, triangulation techniques, and a normative examination of Indonesian criminal law, Islamic law, and maqasid al-shariah principles. The findings show that the concept of justice collaborators in Indonesian positive law is legally recognized through SEMA No. 04 of 2011 and functions as an important mechanism for uncovering organized crimes through cooperating offender testimony. From the Islamic law perspective, the concept aligns with maqasid al-shari‘ah, particularly the principles of maslahah, justice, and public welfare. Differences emerge among Islamic schools of thought regarding the acceptance of cooperating offenders as witnesses. The Hanafi school rejects their testimony due to fairness requirements, whereas the Shafi‘i school allows it through repentance and qiyas. Thus, justice collaborators support substantive justice and modern evidentiary development. Justice collaborators strengthen criminal justice systems by integrating legal effectiveness, maqasid al-shari‘ah principles, substantive justice, and public welfare. This research contributes theoretically, practically, and methodologically by integrating Indonesian criminal law and maqasid al-shariah perspectives comprehensively.