<![CDATA[Competency development for Civil Servants (Aparatur Sipil Negara/ASN) in the public sector is often constrained by administrative formalism (digital formalism) and implemented in a fragmented manner without a clearly defined strategic roadmap. This study aims to develop a Micro Human Capital Development Plan (HCDP) framework for the Functional Position of Human Resource Analyst for Civil Service (Analis Sumber Daya Manusia Aparatur/HR Analyst) within the Election Supervisory Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (Bawaslu RI) by operationally redefining the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) as a strategic organizational architecture. This framework addresses the absence of an integrated HCDP document and the misalignment between training materials and the Position Competency Standards (Standar Kompetensi Jabatan/SKJ), which has led to significant disparities in training credit hours (Jam Pelajaran/JP) among employees. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach through policy document analysis and a systematic literature review. The findings indicate that the Analysis phase successfully identifies actual technical competency gaps (skill gaps) based on Position Information Analysis (Analisis Jabatan/Anjab). Subsequently, the Design and Development phases produce a competency-theme matrix accompanied by an adaptive participant quota load-balancing strategy aligned with the agency's operational cycle. During the Implementation phase, the curriculum is integrated into Bawaslu's Learning Management System (LMS) ecosystem to operationalize the Zero-Cost Competency Development (Bangkom Nol Rupiah) initiative. Finally, the Evaluation phase establishes quality assurance instruments and equitable mechanisms for monitoring the distribution of training credit hours. The proposed HCDP framework is positioned as an internal reference model and pilot project that is essential for transforming Bawaslu's human resource management from a merely administrative function into an inclusive evidence-based policy framework that strengthens the professionalism of election oversight.]]>
