<![CDATA[The development of creative economy financing policies, in relation to the use of copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee, raises legal issues when applied to traditional cultural expressions (EBT). This condition has given rise to debate regarding the suitability of EBT with the principles of guarantee law, especially regarding ownership, economic valuation, and implementation of execution. This study aims to analyze the position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee based on the theory of guarantee law, as well as to examine its implementation and legal problems. The benefit is that it can strengthen the legal position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach analyzed descriptively-analystically. The results show that copyright on EBT does not meet the characteristics of an object of fiduciary guarantee because it does not fulfill the material element in the form of ownership rights (eigendom), has the character of res extra commercium, and has the potential to conflict with public order (openbare orde) in the implementation of execution. Furthermore, the implementation of renewable energy as a fiduciary guarantee object faces obstacles in terms of legal subjects, as it is a communal asset managed by the state, and in terms of objects, due to the lack of financial valuation standards from the Indonesian Society of Appraisers (MAPPI). Therefore, it is crucial for the House of Representatives (DPR) to establish specific, sui generis regulations to ensure legal certainty and protect the communal character of renewable energy, thereby providing protection for the community.]]>
