Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research
Nunik Hariyani
Universitas Merdeka Madiun, Indonesia
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Framing Analysis of the News on Alleged Corruption of Madiun Mayor Maidi in the Online Media Kompas.com and Sinergia Mediatama Muhammad Chandra Irawan; Nunik Hariyani; Fikri Hasan
EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research Vol. 4 No. 01 (2026): EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher : CV. Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/edujavare.v4i01.1412

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) arrested Maidi in an operation related to alleged project fee collection and misappropriation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds. This study aims to comparatively analyze the framing of news coverage regarding the alleged corruption against Madiun Mayor Maidi in the online media Kompas.com and Sinergia Mediatama during January 2026. This study uses a qualitative descriptive-comparative approach using Robert N. Entman's (1993) framing analysis model, which consists of four elements: defining the problem, diagnosing the cause, making a moral judgment, and recommending a response. Data consisting of 20 news articles were collected through digital documentation and purposive sampling techniques, then analyzed using a framing coding instrument. The findings of this study indicate that Kompas.com constructed its coverage with a legalistic-structural framework: defining the case as systematic corruption, providing explicit personal causal attributions to Maidi, presenting condemnatory moral judgments, and recommending strict formal law enforcement. In contrast, Sinergia Mediatama developed a contextual-humanistic framework: defining the case through a local impact perspective, being more cautious in causal attribution, acknowledging Maidi's developmental contributions, and emphasizing the sustainability of local public services. These differences in framework reflect the influence of each media outlet's editorial position, geographic proximity, and audience orientation in constructing the reality of coverage of legal cases involving local officials.
Agenda-Setting Theory in Megathrust Disaster Communication: A Content Analysis of Coverage in Kompas.com Nunik Hariyani; Alfiana Yuniar Rahmawati; Azizah Choirunisa Azzahra
Mediakita Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Usluhuddin dan Dakwah UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mediakita.v10i2.2755

Abstract

This study analyzes how online media frames disaster issues through an agenda-setting theory approach, with a particular focus on identifying agenda elements, strengths, and weaknesses in messages related to the megathrust threat in Indonesia. Using qualitative content analysis, this study examined 24 articles published on the Kompas.com news portal between August 12 and 30, 2024. The findings show that Kompas.com consistently prioritized the megathrust issue, emphasizing threats in specific regions, such as the Sunda Strait and southern Java. The outlet successfully constructed a preparedness narrative by highlighting concrete mitigation measures, including the use of disaster preparedness bags and early warning systems. However, the analysis reveals weaknesses in the use of complex technical language and a tendency toward sensational framing that risks triggering excessive public anxiety without adequate mitigation counterbalance. Coverage was dominated by institutional actors (BMKG and BNPB), with active, independent community participation underemphasized. Theoretically, this research reinforces the agenda-setting mechanism, demonstrating that online media strongly tend to frame disaster issues through educational and preparedness narratives. In practice, it recommends that media balance urgency reporting with accessible, practical solutions to minimize negative psychological impacts on the public.
Co-Authors Alfiana Yuniar Rahmawati Azizah Choirunisa Azzahra Fikri Hasan Muhammad Chandra Irawan