Masitah Shahrill
Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The The Case of Two Year 5’s Understanding of Fractions Addition: An Insight into Their Strategies Nor’Arifahwati Abbas; Masitah Shahrill; Ratu Ilma Indra Putri
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026): Mathematics Education Journal
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The level of pupils’ accuracy in elaborating their strategies provides important insight into their understanding of fractions addition. This study had a dual purpose: to explore the strategies used by Year 5 pupils when computing fractions addition involving like fractions (FAWL), unlike fractions with related multiples (FARM), and unlike fractions without related multiples (FAWORM), and to examine the mathematical accuracy of their explanations. A qualitative case study design was employed, involving two Year 5 pupils from two primary schools in Brunei who participated in five interview sessions. Data were collected through task-based activities and stimulated recall interviews. The findings revealed a limited range of strategies across the three task types and two contrasting levels of accuracy in pupils’ explanations, despite both pupils arriving at correct answers for all fractions addition tasks. While some explanations reflected procedural descriptions, others demonstrated an accurate understanding through explicit reference to key concepts such as ‘same size’ and ‘same value’. These findings reinforce the view that correct answers alone do not guarantee conceptual understanding and highlight the importance of examining pupils’ verbal elaborations alongside their written strategies when interpreting their understanding of fractions addition.
Strong and Weak Mathematical Connections among Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Differential Calculus Problem-Solving Didik Sugeng Pambudi; Masitah Shahrill
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): Mathematics Education Journal
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/mej.v20i1.pp125-144

Abstract

Differential calculus problem requires the ability to connect various mathematical ideas, making mathematical connection ability an essential skill. Research indicates that prospective mathematics teachers demonstrate varying levels of mathematical connection ability. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical connection ability when solving differential calculus problems. An exploratory qualitative approach was employed involving 61 prospective mathematics teachers enrolled in a differential calculus course at a university in Indonesia. Data were collected through a written differential calculus problem and semi-structured interviews. The written responses were analyzed using five mathematical connections indicators, each scored on a scale of 0–20, to classify participants into strong, moderate, and weak levels. Interview data were used to investigate the processes and factors underlying the emergence of different mathematical connection types. The analysis revealed four types of mathematical connections: part–whole, different representation, procedural, and implication connections. Prospective mathematics teachers with strong mathematical connection level were able to coherently integrate geometric concepts, representations, and calculus procedures by effectively connecting prior knowledge, such as right circular cone geometry and triangle similarity, with new knowledge, particularly the chain rule. In contrast, those with weak mathematical connection ability exhibited fragmented or incorrect prior knowledge, leading to inappropriate representations, flawed mathematical models, and difficulties in applying calculus concepts logically. These findings highlight that the success of differential calculus problem solving depends not only on procedural proficiency but also on the quality of mathematical connections constructed between prior and new knowledge.