Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan
Mauza Farah Yuriko Terazono
Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGITIMASI SOSIAL DAN PERSAINGAN KELUARGA POLITIK DI KABUPATEN NAGAN RAYA, ACEH (2002-2024) Mauza Farah Yuriko Terazono
MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan Volume 42, No. 1, (Juni 2026) [Accredited Sinta 3, No 79/E/KPT/2023]
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah (Universitas Islam Bandung)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/mimbar.v42i1.10605

Abstract

This study examines how social legitimacy is constructed, contested, and reconstructed by two competing political families in Nagan Raya Regency, Aceh, across four electoral cycles (2002–2024). Background: Decentralization opened new arenas for local elite competition, yet the ideational and narrative dimensions sustaining dynastic legitimacy remain underexplored. Purpose: To analyze mechanisms of social legitimacy construction and the dynamics of inter-dynastic competition in shaping electoral preferences. Methods: Qualitative interpretive approach with critical discourse analysis; data gathered via in-depth interviews, campaign documents, media archives, and KIP Nagan Raya electoral data (2006–2024). Results: Legitimacy was constructed through three collective social narrative typologies—collective pride (2002–2012), dominance normalization (2012–2017), and anti-dynasty transformation (2017–2022)—followed by a restorative re-narrative in 2024. Conclusion: Multilayered symbolic capital rooted in genealogy, development memory, and communal identity demonstrated electoral durability beyond a single defeat. Implications: Post-decentralization local competition is fundamentally a contest over narrative legitimacy; institutional reforms must address structural conditions enabling dynastic narrative reproduction.
Co-Authors