Suratno Pradotodiningrat
Duta Bangsa University, Surakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Assistance in the Implementation of a BUMDes Information System as an Effort to Strengthen Legal Compliance and Village Governance in Wirogunan Village, Kartasura, Sukoharjo Suratno Pradotodiningrat; Thinesh AL R Ganesan; Aris Prio Agus Santoso
Abdi Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Abdi Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/1z43kf26

Abstract

The management of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in Wirogunan Village, Kartasura, Sukoharjo, is still predominantly conducted using manual systems, with limited utilization of information technology, low digital literacy among village officials, and suboptimal legal and administrative accountability. This condition creates a gap between the demands of digital-based good governance and existing practices at the village level. This community service program aims to enhance the institutional capacity of BUMDes through the implementation of an integrated information system to strengthen legality, transparency, and the effectiveness of village business management. The method used is a participatory-empirical approach, including needs assessment, system design, hybrid implementation (offline and online training), and evaluation through pre-test and post-test. The results show a significant improvement in participants’ understanding, where the average pre-test score of 45% increased to 82% in the post-test. This indicates that the mentoring program effectively improves digital literacy, legal awareness, and governance quality of BUMDes. The program contributes to the development of a digital-based BUMDes governance model that is more transparent, accountable, and sustainable.
Legal Juridical Analysis of the Responsibility of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in Business Activities: A Comparative Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Law Suratno Pradotodiningrat; Noor Hasnah Binti Hasan
The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 03 (2026): The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights (ESLHR)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/eslhr.v4i03.997

Abstract

In practice, the implementation of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in Indonesia still faces fundamental problems, including weak managerial professionalism, limited administrative capacity, and an underdeveloped legal and financial accountability system. In addition, BUMDes remains highly dependent on village government structures, indicating that it has not yet fully functioned as an independent and professional business entity. Normatively, BUMDes is expected to operate as an autonomous village enterprise with legal certainty, professionalism, and strong accountability in all business activities, including clear liability arrangements in cases of losses or business disputes. However, a significant gap exists in practice, particularly regarding the unclear legal status of BUMDes as an independent legal subject, which creates uncertainty in the allocation of liability between the village government, management, and BUMDes itself. This research aims to analyze the legal regulation of the position and responsibility of BUMDes in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as the legal mechanisms for liability in cases of loss or disputes, in order to develop a model for strengthening legal certainty in village-based enterprises. The study employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative comparative approach between Indonesian and Malaysian legal concepts. The findings indicate that although BUMDes under Government Regulation No. 11/2021 is formally recognized as a legal entity with economic, social, administrative, and legal responsibilities, its implementation is still constrained by governance weaknesses and unclear liability boundaries. This results in liability ambiguity, requiring stronger structural, substantive, and cultural legal reforms to ensure legal certainty and good governance. Â