Khairunnas Khairunnas
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Bima

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Classification of Swiftlet Nest Quality Based on SNI 8998:2021 Using Deep Learning Ilmiati Ilmiati; Siti Mutmainah; Khairunnas Khairunnas
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 8 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v8i1.9901

Abstract

The quality of swiftlet nests is a key factor in determining the market value and quality standards of this commodity in both domestic and international markets. The quality classification process, which is currently dominated by manual methods, has fundamental weaknesses, namely high subjectivity and inconsistency in sorting results. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep learning architectures in automatically classifying the quality of swiftlet nests based on visual characteristics. The main contribution of this study is to address the research gap in previous publications by strictly aligning quality class labels with the formal document of the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) 8998:2021, as well as presenting a cross-architecture comparative analysis to map model performance trade-offs. Evaluations were conducted on the MobileNetV2, and presents a cross-architecture comparative analysis to map model performance trade-offs. Evaluations were conducted on the MobileNetV2, ResNet50, and YOLOv8n-cls architectures using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The research dataset includes visual images of swiftlet nests grouped into three quality classes (good, moderate, and poor) through self-documentation and augmentation techniques. Test results show that YOLOv8n-cls achieved the highest performance in this scenario with an accuracy of 99.5%, precision of 98.78%, recall of 98.72%, and an F1-score of 98.71%. Meanwhile, MobileNetV2 achieved a competitive accuracy of 98.37% with good computational efficiency, while ResNet50 demonstrated the lowest performance (66% accuracy) due to network complexity on the limited dataset. This research indicates that lightweight architectures exhibit good stability for limited-size visual datasets; however, external validation using larger datasets remains necessary to test the models’ generalization capabilities more broadly.
Komparasi Kinerja Arsitektur MobileNetV2 dan EfficientNetB0 Untuk Klasifikasi Penyakit Daun Tanaman Kedelai Lisdiawati Lisdiawati; Siti Mutmainah; Khairunnas Khairunnas
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 8 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v8i1.10006

Abstract

Soybean leaf diseases can reduce the quality and productivity of plants, so an accurate and efficient detection method is needed. This study aims to compare the performance of the MobileNetV2 and EfficientNetB0 architectures in classifying soybean leaf diseases using a deep learning-based transfer learning approach. The dataset used consists of soybean leaf images grouped into several disease classes, then divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) data. The pre-processing stage includes resizing the images to 224 × 224 pixels, normalizing pixel values, and data augmentation in the form of rotation, shifting, zooming, and horizontal flipping. The training process is carried out using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate and applying Early Stopping to reduce the risk of overfitting. Model evaluation is carried out using a confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results show that MobileNetV2 obtains an accuracy of 81%, higher than EfficientNetB0 which obtains an accuracy of 70%. The contribution of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of both architectures in classifying soybean leaf diseases and to show that MobileNetV2 is more optimal for application to the dataset used.