Dedeh Maryani
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Policy Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paskibraka Program at the Provincial Level of DKI Jakarta Miftackul Huda; Dedeh Maryani; Mutia Rahmah
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 5 No. 06 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), June 2026
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study was motivated by the gap between the normative design of Presidential Regulation Number 51 of 2022 and BPIP Regulation Number 3 of 2022 and the implementation of the National Flag Hoisting Troop Program (Paskibraka), including overlapping authority among selection assessors, limitations of the Transparency Application, unequal access for participants from island regions, and the suboptimal follow-up development of Purnapaskibraka Pancasila Ambassador members. The research problem addressed is how to evaluate the policy implementation of the Paskibraka Program at the provincial level in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. This study employed a qualitative approach within a post-positivist paradigm using a case study method. The evaluation was analyzed using William N. Dunn’s (2018) six evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with nine informants selected through purposive sampling from BPIP, the provincial organizing committee, and Purnapaskibraka Pancasila Ambassadors, complemented by document studies. The data were then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014) through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that the policy has not been implemented optimally. Effectiveness was achieved only in the formation stage and the execution of flag-hoisting duties, while the four subsequent sub-programs have not yet been implemented. Efficiency has not been achieved because the budget is concentrated on the first two sub-programs, whereas the remaining three follow-up sub-programs receive no allocation. Adequacy and equity have not been fulfilled due to unequal participant access in the Administrative Regency of the Thousand Islands, while responsiveness and appropriateness have only been partially achieved. The study concludes that the policy requires revision regarding the technical regulation of the four follow-up sub-programs. It is recommended to revise Article 11 Paragraph (2) of Presidential Regulation Number 51 of 2022 and Article 21 Paragraph (2) of BPIP Regulation Number 3 of 2022, develop implementation and technical guidelines for the follow-up sub-programs, and incorporate monitoring and sustainability dimensions into the policy evaluation framework for Pancasila ideological development.
Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of the 2024 Ministry of Youth and Sports Youth Service Program (Study in Lebak Regency, Banten Province) Depta Eki Novian; Dedeh Maryani; Eva Eviany
INFOKUM Vol. 13 No. 04 (2025): Infokum
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58471/infokum.v13i04.2929

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Collaborative Governance in the implementation of the 2024 Bakti Pemuda Nusantara Program (BAPEN) organized by the Ministry of Youth and Sports (Kemenpora) in Lebak Regency, Banten Province. This program is a national initiative involving cross-sector actors, including the central government, local governments, youth organizations, and local communities, in encouraging youth empowerment and development of the 3T (underdeveloped, outermost, and frontier) regions. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, and examines the four main dimensions of Collaborative Governance, namely Starting Condition, Institutional Design, Facilitative Leadership, and Collaborative Process. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the program has reflected quite effective collaborative practices. The local government showed high structural readiness and flexibility in responding to the program, while local youth organizations appeared enthusiastic and played an active role in assisting participants. Institutionally, the program is supported by formal regulations from the center and regions, as well as strong operational coordination through the establishment of a Joint Secretariat at the activity location. Facilitative and solution-oriented leadership also contributed to smooth implementation, especially in the face of time and resource constraints. However, there were weaknesses in aspects of hasty initial planning, the absence of a permanent collaborative forum, and a weak support system for program alumni in their home regions. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the Collaborative Governance approach has great potential to strengthen the effectiveness of youth programs in the regions, but requires improvements in terms of initial planning, sustainable institutions, and cross-sector policy integration so that program results can be more optimal and sustainable.
(Analysis of Government Response to Natural Disaster Management in Sumatra: A Case Study on Response Delays, Interagency Coordination, and Institutional Capacity) Dedeh Maryani; Nindya Adhisty; Sutan Riska Tuanku Kerajaan; Subhandhy Subhandhy; Muhammad Iqbal Sarabayan Pazka
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), December 2025
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study employed a qualitative research method, focusing on a case study of the recent flood disasters in Sumatra that occurred over the past two weeks. The research aims to evaluate the government’s response to these disasters through the lens of Mazmanian and Sabatier’s policy implementation theory, which emphasizes three primary determinants of policy implementation success: problem tractability, the ability of policy decisions to structure implementation, and non-statutory variables, including local context, organizational culture, and political support.The findings indicate that delayed initial responses, fragmented coordination among government agencies and technical institutions, and limited institutional capacity significantly undermined the effectiveness of flood management. Furthermore, although existing policy frameworks have been formalized, they remain insufficiently adaptive and do not provide adequate operational mechanisms to address the complex and dynamic nature of disaster events. These shortcomings have contributed to heightened public dissatisfaction and demands from communities struggling for survival. This study is expected to provide academic insights and constructive guidance for the government in enhancing policy implementation for disaster management, particularly in the context of the ongoing floods in Sumatra
Collaboration on the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) between the Central and Regional Governments as a Political Tool Osman Affan; Anwar harun Damanik; Mu’ammar Mu’ammar; Luhut Fedrik Rio; Dedeh Maryani
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), December 2025
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) is a strategic government initiative to provide legal certainty over land rights and ensure orderly land administration. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms of collaboration between the central and regional governments in implementing PTSL and examine the program's function as a political instrument. Using a qualitative approach, this study finds that the success of PTSL is highly dependent on policy synergy, budget support, and human resource capacity at both levels of government. Politically, the success of PTSL strengthens government legitimacy and increases electoral support, but also carries the risk of bureaucratic politicization and distributional inequality if not closely monitored.
Post Flood Disaster Management Practices with Collaborative Governance in Indonesia Dedeh Maryani; Achmad Suhawi; Ika Ahyani Kurniawati; Isnaldi Muhammad Dini
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), December 2025
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that the major floods and landslides that struck Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra at the end of 2025 caused multidimensional impacts, including loss of life, mass displacement, and damage to infrastructure and ecosystems. The complexity of post-disaster management demands cross-sector collaborative governance in accordance with the mandate of Law No. 24 of 2007. This study aims to analyze the urgency and design of multi-stakeholder collaboration from a Public Administration perspective, grounded in Collaborative Governance theory, Collaborative Governance Regimes, and the Pentahelix model. The research employs a qualitative-descriptive approach through literature review and policy analysis. Data are drawn from regulations, theoretical literature, reports from BNPB/BPBD, and national media publications. Analysis is conducted by mapping theoretical frameworks to field findings, identifying implementation gaps, and synthesizing policy recommendations. The results indicate that post-disaster management in Sumatra faces obstacles such as regional isolation, disruptions to electricity and telecommunications networks, limited capacity of BPBD, and ecological vulnerability in upstream areas. The application of trust-building principles, small wins, and CGR-based collaborative regimes can strengthen cross-provincial coordination. The Pentahelix model serves as a practical architecture to orchestrate the roles of government, communities, academia, the private sector, and the media in restoring basic services, rehabilitating infrastructure, and reducing recurrent risks. Collaborative governance that integrates the Ansell & Gash framework, the Emerson–Nabatchi CGR, and the Pentahelix model is key to effective post-disaster flood management in Sumatra. Policy recommendations include establishing cross-provincial Collaborative Command Posts, adopting operational small wins, integrating academic studies into technical decision-making, strengthening a unified disaster data system, and considering national disaster status in accordance with the indicators set out in Law No. 24 of 2007