Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan
Alvina Cherisa Damayanti
Universitas Negeri Malang

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Representasi G30S dalam Buku Teks Sejarah SMA Kurikulum 1994 Terbitan Erlangga Edisi Kedua: Analisis Wacana Kritis Roger Fowler Alvina Cherisa Damayanti; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v12i2.34629

Abstract

This study was motivated by the controversy surrounding the narrative of the September 30th Movement (G30S), which during the New Order era was presented in a one-sided manner and tended to vilify the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) through various media, including history textbooks, thereby raising suspicions of ideological bias and political interests in their compilation, even though the publisher was a private company. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze how the G30S is represented in the textbook “Sejarah Nasional Indonesia dan Umum: Untuk SMU Kelas 3,” published by Erlangga and authored by Badrika in 1997, by examining aspects of vocabulary, grammar, the representation of actors and events, as well as the ideology embedded within it. This aims to uncover the discourse constructions and interests behind the G30S narrative. The method used is qualitative research employing Roger Fowler’s Critical Discourse Analysis model, which focuses on language analysis as a social practice. The results indicate that the use of specific vocabulary and sentence structures creates a negative image of the PKI and a positive image of the military, while simultaneously limiting the reader’s perspective. Furthermore, the G30S events are represented in a linear manner, with the PKI as the primary actor and the military as the savior, without presenting the historical complexities. This discourse also contains New Order ideology that emphasizes the legitimacy of power and the instillation of Pancasila values. In conclusion, the textbook is not neutral but rather a product of discourse.
Co-Authors