Aljohani Mousa Qashqary
The Australian National University, Australia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Responding to Structural Shocks: Hadith of the Prophet and the Social Resilience of Early Islamic Communities Halimi Najeeb Alkhawlani; Aljohani Mousa Qashqary; Mohamed Ibrahim Rejab; Abdelrazek Hasan bin Zawawi; Siti Najihah binti Mahmud
Hamidah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Hamidah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/n7xvks47

Abstract

Structural shocks—such as economic crises, social conflicts, and political disruptions—are historical realities that shaped the dynamics of early Islamic communities. However, hadith studies are still dominated by normative, partial readings, thus inadequate for comprehensively explaining collective responses to crises. This study aims to construct a conceptual framework for hadith-based social resilience by analyzing the representation of structural shocks, collective response patterns, and resilience mechanisms of early Islamic communities. This study uses a qualitative approach based on literature reviews, employing thematic-contextual analysis of hadiths selected for their relevance to social crises, which are then classified, coded, and interpreted through socio-historical readings to reconstruct the contexts in which they emerged. The results show that hadiths can be classified into three main patterns of social resilience: First, crisis identification through disruption indicators such as distribution inequality, internal conflict, and vulnerability of marginalized groups; second, collective response strategies that include strengthening solidarity, redistributive obligations (such as zakat and ṣadaqah), and community-based social protection mechanisms; Third, an adaptive prophetic leadership model characterized by situational responsiveness, moral legitimacy, and an orientation toward long-term stability. These findings confirm that the hadith serves as a structured normative-strategic framework for building social resilience. This research expands the approach to hadith studies toward an integrative-contextual reading and offers conceptual contributions to the development of social resilience studies from an Islamic perspective.
Islamophobia and the Construction of Global Historiography:A Critical Analysis of the Representation of Islamic History in International Discourse Halimi Najeeb Alkhawlani; Aljohani Mousa Qashqary; Mohamed Ibrahim Rejab; Abdelrazek Hasan Bin Zawawi; Daniel Jou
Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Islamic History in the Post-Oriental Era
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/94bj1766

Abstract

The rise in Islamophobic incidents following 21st-century geopolitical events has sparked debate about the representation of Islamic history in global historiography. Several studies have highlighted the dominance of conflict-oriented interpretive frameworks, but the relationship between Islamophobia, historical source selection, and the formation of global narratives has rarely been systematically examined. This study aims to identify patterns of representation of Islamic history, explain the mechanisms of historiographic construction, and examine the epistemological implications of Islamophobia in international historical literature. This literature review employs a qualitative approach, drawing on critical historiography and critical discourse analysis. The research corpus includes historiographic works published between 2001 and 2025, selected based on thematic relevance, citation influence, and a focus on global Islamic history. The analysis was conducted in the following stages: narrative classification, terminology identification, argumentation pattern tracing, dominant theme mapping, and epistemological framework interpretation. The results reveal three main tendencies: the dominance of narratives of conflict and Islamic political expansion; the marginalization of the intellectual, scientific, economic, and institutional contributions of the Islamic world; and the use of terminology that associates Islam with security threats and the clash of civilizations. The analysis also uncovered source selection practices that focused on Euro-Atlantic perspectives, neglected transregional networks of knowledge transmission, and limited use of Islamic primary sources. These patterns of representation reinforce the reproduction of stereotypes and narrow understanding of the complex history of Islamic civilization. These findings indicate the significant role of historiographical construction in shaping global perceptions of Islamic history and underscore the urgency of a reflexive, multi-perspective, and decolonial approach in contemporary historiographical studies.