Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

LEGAL REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN DECISION NUMBER 17/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PN PLK Theresia; Rico Septian Noor; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20918278

Abstract

Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Plk, handed down by the Palangka Raya Corruption Court against defendants Ben Brahim S. Bahat, former Regent of Kapuas, and Ary Egahni, member of the Indonesian House of Representatives, is an example of the application of additional penalties in corruption cases. The judge not only imposed the principal penalty of imprisonment and a fine, but also additional penalties in the form of a replacement payment of Rp8.8 billion and revocation of political rights to be elected to public office for five years after completing the sentence. This study aims to analyze the judge's considerations in imposing these additional penalties using normative, philosophical, and sociological approaches, and in relation to applicable criminal theories in Indonesia. The results of the analysis indicate that the additional penalty of replacement money was imposed based on Article 18 of the Corruption Law and Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014, with the consideration of returning state losses proportionally. Meanwhile, the revocation of political rights is based on Article 35 of the Criminal Code and the Constitutional Court Decision which confirms the constitutionality of the revocation of political rights of corruption perpetrators. From a sentencing theory perspective, the judge balanced the objectives of retributive, deterrence, and corrective justice. This decision demonstrates that the court not only upholds the law but also safeguards the integrity of democracy and rebuilds public trust in anti-corruption efforts.
Batas Hukum Pidana bagi Masyarakat dalam Memviralkan Identitas Pelaku Kejahatan di Media Sosial Yeni Priskia Oktavia Rinie; Andika Wijaya; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang
HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/bpnf2026

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the limitations of criminal law in making the identity of a criminal go viral, as well as the synchronization between the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP). The study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The research data consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive qualitative methods using deductive legal reasoning to examine the relationship between personal data protection norms and public participation in law enforcement. The results show that the act of making the identity of a criminal go viral can be qualified as doxing if it is done with an intentional element (mens rea) to damage a person's dignity or disseminate personal data without authorization. Legal limitations require society to respect the principle of the presumption of innocence, the protection of permanent digital traces, and digital ethics in the use of social media. The synchronization between the ITE Law and the PDP Law forms a complementary legal framework, where legal certainty is achieved when public participation is channeled through official reporting mechanisms to law enforcement officials. This study's limitation lies in the use of a normative approach that has not examined empirical implementation in the field. Therefore, further research is recommended to use an empirical approach to evaluate the effectiveness of the ITE Law and the PDP Law in addressing doxing practices and digital vigilantism.  
Efektivitas Asesmen Terpadu dalam Menentukan Rehabilitasi bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika di BNN Kota Palangka Raya Judius Syahpala Sidauruk; Kiki Kristanto; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang; Vicka Prama Wulandari
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 7 (2026): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i7.3683

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Integrated Assessment implementation in determining the eligibility for rehabilitation of drug abusers at the Palangka Raya City National Narcotics Agency (BNN), as well as to identify strategies to overcome various operational obstacles in the field. The research method used is empirical juridical with a descriptive qualitative approach. The results indicate that during 2024, 124 clients underwent drug rehabilitation. The assessment was conducted through medical examinations and legal analysis to determine the offender's status and support a restorative justice approach. Despite obstacles such as limited budget, facilities and inter-agency coordination, the Palangka Raya City BNN continues to make improvements through crossagency collaboration and the use of communication technology.