Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

OPTIMIZING THE MANAGEMENT OF STATE-CONFISCATED GOODS IN THE CLASS II TERNATE STORAGE HOUSE OF STATE-CONFISCATED GOODS Aslan Hasan; Mayadiar A. Redjeb; Ainurrafiqa Pelupessy; Arief Budiono
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20756329

Abstract

The State Confiscated Goods Storage House (RUPBASAN) holds a strategic position in the criminal justice system as the institution responsible for managing confiscated and seized assets used as evidence in criminal proceedings. Effective asset management is essential to ensure legal certainty, accountability, and the integrity of judicial processes. This study aims to examine the optimization of confiscated and seized asset management at the Class II RUPBASAN in Ternate and to analyze the factors affecting the non-execution of such assets. This research adopts an empirical legal approach, utilizing both primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained through field interviews, while secondary data consisted of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through a literature review. The findings reveal that asset management at the Ternate Class II RUPBASAN—covering receipt, registration, classification, placement, security, maintenance, transfer, disposal, and release—generally complies with applicable regulations. However, shortcomings persist at the receipt stage, particularly in the processes of assessment and examination, due to the absence of qualified personnel. Optimization is therefore required, especially in the stages of receipt, maintenance, and transfer. The study identifies legal factors and law enforcement capacity as the main obstacles to the effective execution of confiscated and seized assets.
Comprehensive Study of Mass Poisoning MBG Program (Legal, Health, Human Rights, Social Perspectives) Aprilliany Zahra Nur Azzalia Jacob; Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya; Dian Rositasari; Ainurrafiqa Pelupessy; Muhammad Fachrur Razy Mahka
Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan
Publisher : Yayasan Inovasi Kemajuan Intelektual

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55826/jtmit.v4i3.1583

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) program is a strategic government policy to improve the quality of human resources, but its implementation faces serious technical risks in including mass poisoning incidents. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the phenomenon of mass poisoning in the MBG program through four main perspectives: law, health, human rights (HAM), and social. Using a normative-empirical research method with a case study approach, this study explores systemic failures in the food supply chain. The results of the study indicate that mass poisoning is not merely a medical problem, but rather a representation of weak enforcement of food safety regulations, violations of the basic right to safe food, and triggers social distrust in state institutions. This study recommends strengthening food safety protocols, standardizing food supply units, and establishing clear legal accountability mechanisms to protect citizens as rights holders.