Muhammad 'Azmi Nuha
Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of mathematics students’ mathematical thinking based on learning styles Muhammad 'Azmi Nuha; Jun Mark R. Panlaan
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 14 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v14i1.22658

Abstract

Mathematical thinking is an essential competence for mathematics students and involves four main components: generalizing, specializing, conjecturing, and justification or persuasion. A preliminary study conducted among undergraduate students of the Tadris Mathematics Study Program at UIN Saizu Purwokerto in 2024 indicated that students still experienced difficulties in formulating mathematical conjectures. Since learning styles may influence students’ engagement with mathematical tasks, this study aimed to explore prospective mathematics teachers’ learning styles and their mathematical thinking abilities. This study employed a qualitative methodology using a grounded theory approach. The research was conducted in 2025 at UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, involving students from the Mathematics Department. Data were collected through a learning style questionnaire, a mathematical thinking ability test, and interviews. The data were analyzed through reduction, presentation, conclusion drawing, and coding procedures. The results showed that the students’ learning styles were distributed as follows: visual 36%, auditory 32%, kinesthetic 16%, visual-auditory 8%, visual-kinesthetic 4%, and auditory-kinesthetic 4%. However, no specific pattern or tendency was found between learning styles and mathematical thinking ability. Several forms of mathematical thinking emerged from the data, including sequencing patterns without formulating conjectures, justifying processes through image manipulation, justifying processes by analyzing numerical relationships, errors in formulating mathematical conjectures, the importance of persuasion in validating conjectures, difficulties in understanding mathematically related problems, and the role of social media in supporting mathematical thinking. This study contributes to the literature by showing that prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical thinking cannot be inferred directly from learning-style categories, but should be examined through the specific processes of conjecturing, justification, and persuasion demonstrated in mathematical problem solving.
Newman’s error analysis at mathematics pre-service teachers in solving literacy problems Muhammad 'Azmi Nuha; Ragil Meita Alfathy; Retchelle P. Sangco
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 13 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v13i2.20038

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) to provide an overview of the errors of prospective mathematics teacher students in solving mathematics literacy problems based on Newman's Error Analysis, and (2) to provide an overview of the factors that cause prospective mathematics teacher students to make errors in solving mathematics literacy problems. This research is qualitative research using a grounded theory approach. The subjects of this study are 92 prospective mathematics teacher students in the study program of Tadris Mathematics UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto. The data collection techniques in this study are: (1) test and (2) interview. The analysis technique in this study uses qualitative data analysis techniques consisting of (1) data reduction, (2) data presentation, and (3) conclusion drawn. The data validity technique used in this study is triangulation. The results of the study show that: (1) reading error, comprehension error, and encoding error are not problems for students in solving mathematical literacy problems, transformation errors are problems for students because the errors are found in all four mathematics literacy questions, and process skill errors are problems for students in mathematics literacy questions that measure the ability to connect mathematical facts/concepts to make problem-solving procedures work, and (2) factors that cause prospective mathematics teacher students to make errors in solving mathematical literacy problems include: (a) errors in making mathematical models that involve time, (b) errors in length accuracy, (c) errors affected by images, (d) errors in replacing unknown values with spelling, (e) errors in recalling information, (f) errors in estimating the shape of the 3D Geometric Shapes, (g) errors in remembering mathematical formulas,  (h) error in choosing adjacent concepts, (i) error not recognizing mathematical concepts, (j) error preparing calculations, (k) error converting units, and (l) error inferring with estimates.