Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gema Wiralodra International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies
Didi Nursidi
Faculty of Law, Universitas Wiralodra, Indramayu, Indonesia
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Certainty in Digital Spatial Planning Licensing: Rethinking Administrative Decision-Making in Urban Governance Didi Nursidi
International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): IJSECS
Publisher : Sultan Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58291/ijsecs.v4i1.556

Abstract

The digitalization of spatial planning permits has become an important part of urban governance reform, particularly in efforts to improve administrative efficiency and coordination. However, digitalization not only brings procedural changes but also affects how administrative decisions are made and legally accountable. This research aims to analyze digital-based spatial planning permits as an instrument of administrative law, focusing on their implications for the structure of administrative decisions, legal certainty, and administrative justice in urban governance. This research uses a qualitative approach with a juridical-normative method enriched by conceptual analysis. Research data is sourced from administrative legal norms, relevant laws and regulations regarding spatial planning and permits, as well as relevant scientific literature. The research results indicate that the digitalization of permits changes the structure of administrative decision-making from an individual-hierarchical model to a system-based integrated model, which increases procedural efficiency but simultaneously introduces new complexities in the division of legal authority and responsibility. Additionally, digitalization tends to strengthen procedural certainty, but it has not fully guaranteed substantive legal certainty and administrative justice. This research confirms that the success of digital spatial planning licensing is highly dependent on strengthening the administrative legal framework, harmonizing regulations, and establishing effective accountability mechanisms and legal protection.
The Legal Binding Power of the State Administrative Court's Decision In the 2024 General Election Didi Nursidi; Suneri Suneri; Suhendar Suhendar
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v16i1.793

Abstract

In the case of Irman Gusman, the KPU RI cq KPU West Sumatra did not implement the Jakarta PTUN decision, but on the other hand carried out the interlocutory decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia to implement the PSU by including Irman Gusman so that even though the person concerned obtained the fourth most votes, but because he had been crossed out in the DCT of the Candidate for DPD Member of the West Sumatra Dapil, Irman Gusman was declared Failed to Qualify as an Elected DPD Member. This incident shows the complexity of the interests in the legal process which is inconclusive in the administration of the electoral system in Indonesia. For this reason, the problem is formulated as follows: (1) How is the legal binding force of the decision of the State Administrative Court that is qualified as non-executable?; (2) How is the execution of the decision of the State Administrative Court Number: 600/G/SPPU/2023/PTUN. JKT. which is non-executable? In this study , a descriptive method with a juridical-normative approach is used, and the data is analyzed qualitatively by emphasizing the use of applicable laws and regulations, expert opinions and research results.The results of the study show that: (1) As long as the judge's decision is not canceled, then as long as the decision remains legally binding even though it cannot be implemented (Non-Executable); (2) PTUN Decision Number: 600/G/SPPU/2023/PTUN. JKT cannot be carried out because the KPU RI Cq KPU West Sumatra adheres to the Election Stages that have been set
Co-Authors Suhendar Suhendar Suneri Suneri