Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Marwah Hukum
Saan Saan
Universitas Pamulang
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
E-Government Sebagai Objek Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara: Tinjauan Terhadap Kebijakan Digital Pemerintah Saan Saan
Marwah Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/mh.v4i1.10849

Abstract

Praktik Transformasi digital pemerintahan Indonesia telah menghadirkan paradigma baru dalam sistem peradilan tata usaha negara, di mana produk electronic government (e-government) kini menjadi objek sengketa yang memerlukan konstruksi hukum yang adaptif. Penelitian ini menganalisis legalitas e-government sebagai objek sengketa tata usaha negara melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan fokus pada harmonisasi regulasi digital dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum acara peradilan. Landasan konstitusional dalam Pasal 1 ayat (3) dan Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945 memberikan legitimasi fundamental bagi pengakuan e-government dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara menyediakan definisi Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang dapat diadaptasi untuk mengakomodasi produk digital pemerintah yang memenuhi kriteria penetapan tertulis, konkret, individual, dan final. Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik telah memperkuat dasar hukum bagi tindakan administratif digital melalui pengaturan wewenang pemerintah dalam ranah elektronik dan pengakuan informasi elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah  . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa legalitas e-government sebagai objek sengketa tata usaha negara telah memperoleh pengakuan yuridis yang solid, namun menghadapi tantangan dalam aspek harmonisasi procedural dan substantive. Harmonisasi regulasi e-government dengan hukum acara peradilan tata usaha negara memerlukan adaptasi multidimensional yang mengintegrasikan due process, transparency, dan accountability dalam lingkungan digital untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum yang responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi informasi.
The Role Of The Prosecutor in  Optimizing  The  Implementation  of  Criminal  Sentences in  Additional to the Payment of Supervisory Money by  Convicted  Corruption Criminal Acts (The Dilemmatic of  Supervisory Money  Recorded as State Receivables) Sulis Setyowati; Saan Saan; Guntarto Widodo
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/0ds71g33

Abstract

This study examines the role of the executing prosecutor in optimizing the enforcement of additional criminal sanctions in the form of compensation payments imposed on convicted corruption offenders. The execution process involves asset tracing, asset seizure, public auction of confiscated property, asset impoverishment, and the imposition of substitute imprisonment when compensation cannot be recovered. A legal issue arises when a convicted person has completed the substitute imprisonment sentence but still has an unpaid compensation obligation, which is subsequently recorded as a state receivable. As long as the receivable remains outstanding, it continues to be reported in the execution records of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia and creates administrative burdens. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through documentary research and analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that the execution of compensation payments is based on the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2014 and the Attorney General’s regulations governing corruption law enforcement. The amount of compensation corresponds to the financial loss suffered by the state, calculated using either the net loss or total loss method. Therefore, this study recommends establishing a legal mechanism for writing off uncollectible state receivables to ensure legal certainty, reduce administrative burdens, and improve the effectiveness of executing corruption judgments.  
Co-Authors Guntarto Widodo Sulis Setyowati