Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ekonomi, Teknologi dan Bisnis Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia
Amelia Amelia
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Sharing Economy-Based Business Model Innovation: Challenges and Opportunities in the Society 5.0 Era Amelia Amelia
Jurnal Ekonomi Teknologi dan Bisnis (JETBIS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Ekonomi, Teknologi dan Bisnis
Publisher : Al-Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/k7g0mz04

Abstract

The sharing economy has become a global phenomenon that is able to change the traditional business paradigm towards a collaboration-based model. In the context of Society 5.0, the sharing economy is not only seen as a technological innovation, but also as a human-centered society development strategy that emphasizes a balance between economic progress and social problem solving. This research aims to: (1) identify potential sharing economy business model innovations, (2) analyze implementation challenges and opportunities, and (3) formulate synergy strategies with Society 5.0. The research method used is qualitative descriptive, with data collection through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. Data analysis was carried out using Miles & Huberman's interactive model which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawn. The results of the study show that innovations such as pay-per-use, peer-to-peer lending, ride sharing, and coworking space dominate the development of the sharing economy. The main challenges in implementation lie in regulations, digital literacy gaps, limited human resources, and low public trust. However, greater opportunities open up through the use of cutting-edge technology, increased digital literacy, and the implementation of adaptive regulations. The implications of this study show that with strategies to strengthen regulations, inclusive digital transformation, and increase technology-based trust, the sharing economy can be the main driving force for inclusive and sustainable economic development within the framework of Society 5.0.
How Leadership Commitment Shapes the Impact of Scope Management Programs on Team Accountability Ikhsan Nendi; Amelia Amelia
Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59784/glosains.v7i3.774

Abstract

Background: Organizations worldwide continue to experience scope-related project failures despite substantial investment in formal governance programs, indicating that structural mechanisms alone are insufficient to guarantee accountability outcomes. Objective: This study investigates the moderating role of leadership commitment in the relationship between scope management programs and team accountability within corporate settings. Drawing on agency theory, stakeholder theory, and the resource-based view, the research examines how executives' visible endorsement, resource allocation, and behavioral modeling amplify or attenuate the effectiveness of formal scope management initiatives. Methods: Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from 320 project managers and team leaders across manufacturing, financial services, and technology sectors in Indonesia. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0 was employed to test the hypothesized relationships. Results: Findings reveal that leadership commitment significantly moderates the scope management–team accountability relationship (β = 0.412, p < 0.001), with high leadership commitment more than doubling the positive effect of scope management programs. The model explains 56.1% of the variance in team accountability (R² = 0.561). Conclusions: The study contributes to project management theory by integrating leadership as a boundary condition and offers practical guidance for organizations seeking to enhance accountability through governance reforms. Practically, the findings guide executives to pair scope-governance investments with structured leadership-development initiatives that strengthen accountability outcomes.
Co-Authors Nendi, Ikhsan