Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Journal of Constitutional Principles
Adensi Timomor
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Negeri Manado
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KLAIM NINE DASH LINE TIONGKOK ATAS LAUT CHINA SELATAN DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNCLOS 1982 Eklesia E. N. Tendean; Adensi Timomor; Hendrasari B. R. Rawung
Journal of Constitutional Principles Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Juni : Journal of Constitutional Principles
Publisher : PT. Lembaga Penerbit Penelitian Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65244/jcp.v2i1.548

Abstract

Sengketa Laut China Selatan menimbulkan persoalan hukum internasional akibat klaim sepihak nine dash line oleh Tiongkok yang tumpang tindih dengan rezim hukum laut internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum klaim nine dash line ditinjau berdasarkan ketentuan United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 serta mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa Laut China Selatan melalui hukum internasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, khususnya terhadap UNCLOS 1982 dan Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tahun 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa klaim nine dash line tidak memiliki dasar hukum dan bertentangan dengan ketentuan UNCLOS 1982, serta bahwa mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang diatur dalam UNCLOS telah tersedia secara normatif namun menghadapi keterbatasan dalam penerapannya akibat ketergantungan pada kepatuhan negara.
ONLINE POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS REGARDING PUBLIC OPINION MANIPULATION FROM A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE [HTN] Yuliana Menai; Adensi Timomor; Meiske M. W. lasut
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1683

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought about major changes in the way political campaigns are conducted. Campaign activities that were previously carried out conventionally have now shifted to the online realm. This change has had a significant impact on the democratic process, particularly in the context of public opinion manipulation. This study focuses on analyzing law enforcement and the role of constitutional law regulations in regulating and preventing manipulative practices in digital-based political campaigns. The research method used is a normative legal approach by examining various laws and regulations, such as the Election Law, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE), and regulations issued by the General Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu). The findings show that manipulation of public opinion is often carried out in various ways, including the spread of disinformation, the use of fake identities or anonymous accounts, the use of bots, and the application of deepfake technology. In practice, law enforcement efforts against these acts still face various obstacles, such as weak regulations specifically governing digital manipulation, limited law enforcement resources, and difficulties in tracking perpetrators operating in cyberspace. Therefore, it is necessary to update regulations that are responsive to technological developments, improve the competence of election supervisory agencies, and strengthen digital literacy in society. These steps are expected to serve as preventive strategies to realize healthier, more transparent, and democratic political campaigns.
Co-Authors Eklesia E. N. Tendean Hendrasari B. R. Rawung Meiske M. W. lasut Yuliana Menai