Kekoto Manneh
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Relationship Between Auditor Independence and Audit Quality: Evidence from Developing Economies Kekoto Manneh; Indrawati Yuhertiana; Endang Sholihatin
Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi (JIA) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jia.v3i2.13045

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between auditor independence and audit quality in developing economies by systematically reviewing 24 publications published between 2014 and 2025 from the Scopus database, following PRISMA guidelines. The study also used bibliometric analysis to provide a base for quantitative analysis from selected papers using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny (RStudio). The study employed various theories to examine the link between auditor independence and audit quality, elucidating how incentives, institutions, and stakeholders shape auditor conduct. These theories include agency theory, institutional theory, and stakeholder theory. Additionally, the study examines empirical evidence on the relationship between independence and quality in developing economies. It creates a conceptual framework that links this relationship through several moderating and mediating factors, including audit fees, non-audit services (NAS), tenure, regulations, and political connections. Findings of this study reveal that independence significantly influences audit quality, but its effectiveness depends heavily on vigorous regulatory enforcement, ethical commitment, and institutional support. The study has several limitations, including reliance on secondary data, publication bias, and the majority of the reviewed studies employing quantitative approaches, which have restricted our knowledge of the behavioral and ethical aspects of independence. It has been recommended that future researchers adopt mixed-methods approaches, conduct cross-sectional studies, and, most importantly, research trending topics such as digital audit technologies and ESG assurance in relation to data analytics, which are generating new threats to independence that are not covered by known frameworks.
The Role of Auditor Independence in Audit Quality and Fraud Mitigation: A Systematic Literature Review Kekoto Manneh; Indrawati Yuhertiana; Rida Perwita Sari
Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi (JIA) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jia.v4i1.13427

Abstract

Purpose: This study seeks to investigate the contribution of auditors’ independence to the quality of audit services and the mitigation of financial fraud. It also analyses the contextual, technological, and behavioural factors that influence auditor independence. By integrating perspectives from both developed and emerging economies, the study highlights overlooked issues of independence in digital auditing and gender governance, while suggesting directions for future research and policy development. Method: This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA framework. The review consisted of 72 peer-reviewed journal articles obtained primarily from the Scopus-indexed database. The selected articles were analysed to identify key themes related to auditor independence, audit quality, fraud prevention, digital tools, and regulatory environments. Findings: The findings identify four main themes: (1) the impact of auditor independence on the credibility of audit reports, (2) the role of independence in fraud detection and prevention, (3) the influence of digital tools on independent audit judgment, and (4) differences in independence practices across regulatory environments. The study concludes that auditor independence enhances professional skepticism and strengthens audit reliability. Implications: This SLR provides implications for audit firms, regulators, and academics. Audit firms need to strengthen safeguards for auditor independence, enhance ethical training, manage non-audit service risks, and reinforce functional independence through stronger governance mechanisms. Regulators should improve oversight and policy frameworks to ensure independence is maintained in both traditional and digital audit environments. For academia, the study identifies research gaps and provides opportunities for future empirical and comparative studies on auditor independence.