Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Waraqat : Jurnal Ilmu_Ilmu Keislaman
Siti Khodijah
Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Ideological Intrusion in Ahmadiyya Qur’anic Exegesis: A Critical Analysis of al-Dakhi>l as Interpretive Bias Siti Khodijah; Musyarrofah
WARAQAT : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Waraqat: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam As-Sunnah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51590/waraqat.v10i1.1072

Abstract

Ahmadiyya Qur’anic exegesis presents a distinctive hermeneutical framework that diverges significantly from mainstream Islamic interpretations, particularly in relation to ideological intrusions (al-dakhi>l) embedded in its exegetical narratives. This study critically investigates the patterns of ideological intrusion in the exegesis of both the Qadiani and Lahori branches, using a qualitative textual analysis. Primary sources include Haqiqat al-Wahy and Tadhkirah by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, along with exegetical works by Maulawi Sher Ali, Malik Ghulam Farid, and Muhammad Ali. Anchored in the classical theory of al-dakhi>l fi> al-tafsi>r and informed by critical hermeneutics, the analysis identifies three dominant patterns of ideological intrusion: allegorical reinterpretations of miracles, historical reconstruction of the figure of Prophet Isa a.s., and the redefinition of khatam al-nabiyyi>n. While the Qadiani faction tends to affirm Ghulam Ahmad’s prophethood explicitly, the Lahori branch emphasizes rationalism and the role of mujaddidism. The study concludes that Ahmadiyya exegetical methodology, marked by a synthesis of modern rationalism, spiritual subjectivity, and historical reinterpretation, reveals a persistent tension between interpretive innovation and commitment to traditional principles such as sanad and ijma>‘. These findings offer a significant contribution to contemporary Islamic hermeneutics.
Co-Authors Musyarrofah