Abdusyahid Naufal Fathullah
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Digital Transformation of Public Participation in Indonesia's Constitutional System: The Effectiveness of the Indonesian House of Representatives' Aspiration Channel as an Instrument of Participatory Democracy Abdusyahid Naufal Fathullah; Muhamad Alief Hidayat; Andre Arya Pratama
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i1.4635

Abstract

Public participation in Indonesia has increasingly shifted toward digital models following the COVID-19 pandemic, yet substantive engagement remains limited despite 221.56 million internet users and persistent urban–rural digital disparities. Using a socio-legal approach, this study examines the alignment between regulatory frameworks and digital participation practices in the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), focusing on initiatives such as DPR Now! and the Public Aspiration Agency. The findings show that participation mechanisms remain at the tokenistic consultation level on Arnstein’s Ladder, reflected in a low response rate of 3 percent, weak feedback loops, fragmented platforms, and the absence of a legal mandate to integrate public input into legislative decision-making. Comparative analysis with international models, including Decide Madrid and Taiwan, demonstrates the potential to significantly enhance participation through co-creation mechanisms supported by blockchain and AI-based sentiment analysis. Accordingly, this study proposes the establishment of Digital Deliberation Councils, regulatory harmonization, and constitutional amendments to guarantee digital participation rights, providing a foundation for a more inclusive and deliberative digital democracy in Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Penyimpangan Prosedur Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di PT Garuda Indonesia Abdusyahid Naufal Fathullah; Edelweiss Aura Islami; Khumaerastra Fika Salsabila; Finda Pratiwi Yuwono
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 13, No 1: April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v13i1.100856

Abstract

PT Garuda Indonesia is one of the leading state-owned enterprises (BUMN) in the aviation industry, expected to conduct procurement processes in accordance with the principles outlined in Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 on Procurement of Goods/Services, as well as other relevant laws and government regulations governing BUMN. Given that procurement involves the use of state funds, improper management could result in financial losses for both the state and the company itself. In its procurement process, PT Garuda Indonesia implemented a limited tender method. However, in practice, distortions occurred to favor a predetermined winner, particularly in the procurement of Bombardier CRJ-1000 aircraft. This was achieved through manipulation of assessment criteria and leaking of information to specific parties, violating the fundamental principles of transparency, accountability, and responsibility, which should be upheld in every procurement process. This study aims to identify and analyze the modus operandi used in the aircraft procurement by PT Garuda Indonesia, as well as to examine the irregularities in the procurement of goods and services that may lead to corrupt practices within the company. The research method employed is normative legal research, which focuses on analyzing existing legal norms, including statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and fundamental legal principles, while also evaluating their implementation in practice.The corruption case involving the procurement of Bombardier CRJ-1000 aircraft by PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. (PT GIAA) and the procurement of ATR 72-600 aircraft at PT Citilink stands out as one of the most notorious cases in BUMN procurement history. This case significantly impacted state finances due to data manipulation, lack of transparency, and inconsistencies that deviated from the established criteria. Additionally, the irregularities in this procurement process have fueled public distrust toward Law Enforcement Officials (APH) in handling corruption cases within state-owned enterprises.