Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Methodius Kossay
Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer, Semarang, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Jaringan Aktor dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi oleh Kejaksaan: Pendekatan Social Network Analysis Methodius Kossay
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/5bk5k553

Abstract

This study analyzes corruption case handling by the Prosecutor’s Office through a Social Network Analysis (SNA) within the framework of Network Governance Theory. It reconceptualizes prosecutorial performance as a networked enforcement system shaped by inter-organizational relations rather than a purely hierarchical legal process. The unit of analysis is case-based relational networks across investigation, prosecution, and audit stages. Findings indicate a moderately centralized but structurally fragmented network, where cross-institutional coordination is primarily mediated by brokerage actors. Centrality analysis reveals a clear decoupling between formal authority and relational power, with actors holding high betweenness centrality exerting disproportionate influence over information flow and evidentiary validation. Modularity results identify three institutional clusters—investigation, prosecution, and audit—with strong internal cohesion but weak inter-cluster connectivity. This configuration produces a brokerage-dependent enforcement structure, where case progression relies on a limited number of bridging actors. Network density further confirms asymmetric coordination patterns characterized by strong intra-cluster ties and weak inter-cluster integration. The study introduces the concept of configurational enforcement bias, highlighting how network structure systematically shapes prosecutorial outcomes through unequal distribution of information access and coordination capacity. The findings extend Network Governance Theory by demonstrating that criminal justice governance is structurally asymmetric and relationally contingent.
Formulasi Tindak Pidana Ekosida dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Urgensi Pembaruan Hukum di Era Krisis Lingkungan Global Jachrisdo Damanik; Methodius Kossay; Mangaratua Naibaho; Dame Pandiangan
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/2ezjp384

Abstract

The massive scale of environmental destruction globally highlights the urgent need for a stronger legal response, particularly through criminal law. This research aims to formulate the crime of ecocide within Indonesia's national criminal law framework by adapting international principles while aligning with the fundamental doctrines of Indonesian law. Employing a normative legal research method and comparative analysis, this study reveals a significant legal gap in the current regulatory system, which inadequately addresses large-scale ecosystem damage. A conceptual model for the formulation of ecocide crimes is proposed, including the definition of criminal elements, the scope of liable subjects, and the appropriate sanctions. The results contribute to the academic discourse by offering a structured and applicable legal framework, while practically providing policymakers with a concrete foundation for legal reforms that respond effectively to the global environmental crisis.
Pemetaan Rasionalitas Jaksa dalam Seleksi Perkara Korupsi Pendekatan Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Methodius Kossay; Rengga Kusuma Putra
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): JULI: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik (JAKSA)
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/4rvhvq98

Abstract

Prosecutorial discretion in corruption case selection is often explained through linear causal models that emphasize single determinants such as evidentiary strength, institutional pressure, or case severity; however, such approaches are limited in capturing the configurational complexity of decision-making within prosecutorial institutions. This study aims to identify configurational pathways that lead to high prosecutorial priority in corruption case handling using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The study applies a configurational research design based on fsQCA, analyzing six causal conditions consisting of financial loss, actor complexity, public attention, evidence strength, institutional pressure, and asset recovery potential. Data are calibrated into fuzzy-set membership scores (0–1) using a direct calibration approach, followed by truth table construction, necessity analysis, sufficiency analysis, and Boolean minimization using intermediate solutions. The findings reveal three distinct causal pathways leading to high prosecutorial priority: institutionally reinforced legal rationality characterized by high financial loss, strong evidence, and high institutional pressure; visibility-driven prioritization combining actor complexity and public attention with moderate evidentiary strength; and technocratic fiscal rationality driven by high financial loss, high asset recovery potential, and low institutional pressure. No single condition is found to be necessary, confirming equifinality and causal asymmetry. Prosecutorial prioritization in corruption cases is therefore best understood as a configurational phenomenon shaped by multiple interacting rationalities rather than single causal factors, introducing the concept of configurational prosecutorial rationality within criminal justice decision-making.
Co-Authors Dame Pandiangan Jachrisdo Damanik Mangaratua Naibaho Rengga Kusuma Putra