Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tribakti: jurnal pemikiran keIslaman Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Zayad Abd. Rahman
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstructing Ashʿarite Kalam Methodology through Bayani–Burhani–Irfani Integration: An Integrative Review of Contemporary Sunni Theology Nanang Zamroji; Moh. Asror Yusuf; Zayad Abd. Rahman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8781

Abstract

This article examines methodological renewal in Ashʿarite kalam by developing a more explicit conceptual model of epistemological reconstruction. Using an integrative review, the study analyzes 50 core sources selected from classical theological works, peer-reviewed journal articles, and international academic books published mainly between 2000 and 2026, with classical texts used as foundational references. The review asks how Bayani, Burhani, and irfani epistemologies can be operationalized to transform Ashʿarite kalam from a primarily defensive-dialectical discipline into a reconstructive, dialogical, and ethically responsive theology. In response to the need for clearer library-research reporting, the findings are presented through a coding matrix that maps title/author/year, data source or object, conceptual focus, main findings, and thematic codes. The findings produce a triadic reconstruction model: Bayani functions as textual anchoring, Burhani as rational-coherence testing, and irfani as ethical-spiritual orientation. The novelty of this article lies not in repeating the general integration of Islamic epistemologies, but in translating al-jabiri’s epistemic categories into an operational model for contemporary Ashʿarite theological reasoning. This model clarifies how classical Sunni theology can engage modern issues such as scientific rationality, pluralism, human dignity, and technology ethics without abandoning its doctrinal identity.
Reconstructing Ashʿarite Kalam Methodology through Bayani–Burhani–Irfani Integration: An Integrative Review of Contemporary Sunni Theology Nanang Zamroji; Moh. Asror Yusuf; Zayad Abd. Rahman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8781

Abstract

This article examines methodological renewal in Ashʿarite kalam by developing a more explicit conceptual model of epistemological reconstruction. Using an integrative review, the study analyzes 50 core sources selected from classical theological works, peer-reviewed journal articles, and international academic books published mainly between 2000 and 2026, with classical texts used as foundational references. The review asks how Bayani, Burhani, and irfani epistemologies can be operationalized to transform Ashʿarite kalam from a primarily defensive-dialectical discipline into a reconstructive, dialogical, and ethically responsive theology. In response to the need for clearer library-research reporting, the findings are presented through a coding matrix that maps title/author/year, data source or object, conceptual focus, main findings, and thematic codes. The findings produce a triadic reconstruction model: Bayani functions as textual anchoring, Burhani as rational-coherence testing, and irfani as ethical-spiritual orientation. The novelty of this article lies not in repeating the general integration of Islamic epistemologies, but in translating al-jabiri’s epistemic categories into an operational model for contemporary Ashʿarite theological reasoning. This model clarifies how classical Sunni theology can engage modern issues such as scientific rationality, pluralism, human dignity, and technology ethics without abandoning its doctrinal identity.
Reconstructing Ashʿarite Kalam Methodology through Bayani–Burhani–Irfani Integration: An Integrative Review of Contemporary Sunni Theology Nanang Zamroji; Moh. Asror Yusuf; Zayad Abd. Rahman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8781

Abstract

This article examines methodological renewal in Ashʿarite kalam by developing a more explicit conceptual model of epistemological reconstruction. Using an integrative review, the study analyzes 50 core sources selected from classical theological works, peer-reviewed journal articles, and international academic books published mainly between 2000 and 2026, with classical texts used as foundational references. The review asks how Bayani, Burhani, and irfani epistemologies can be operationalized to transform Ashʿarite kalam from a primarily defensive-dialectical discipline into a reconstructive, dialogical, and ethically responsive theology. In response to the need for clearer library-research reporting, the findings are presented through a coding matrix that maps title/author/year, data source or object, conceptual focus, main findings, and thematic codes. The findings produce a triadic reconstruction model: Bayani functions as textual anchoring, Burhani as rational-coherence testing, and irfani as ethical-spiritual orientation. The novelty of this article lies not in repeating the general integration of Islamic epistemologies, but in translating al-jabiri’s epistemic categories into an operational model for contemporary Ashʿarite theological reasoning. This model clarifies how classical Sunni theology can engage modern issues such as scientific rationality, pluralism, human dignity, and technology ethics without abandoning its doctrinal identity.
IKHBAR AWAL BULAN HIJRIAH PESANTREN NU; OTORITAS KEILMUAN Vis-À-Vis MANHAJ KEORGANISASIAN M. Adib Hamzawi; Zayad Abd. Rahman
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Hasanuddin Pare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Di luar dikotomi antara NU dan Muhammadiyah dalam penetapan awal bulan Hijriah, terdapat pegiat falak atau pondok pesantren terafiliasi NU yang menyampaikan ikhbar tentang awal puasa dan Idul Fitri dengan menggunakan pendekatan hisab, salah satunya Ponpes Al-Ghazaliyah Jombang. Melalui penelitian lapangan dengan pendekatan kualitatif, kajian ini berfokus untuk mengkaji apa dasar dan tujuan Ponpes al-Ghazaliyah menyampaikan ikhbar jatuhnya tanggal 1 Ramadhan dan 1 Syawal, bagaimana pandangan Ponpes al-Ghazaliyah terhadap manhaj organisasi NU yang berpatokan pada metode rukyah, dan bagaimana sikap Ponpes al-Ghazaliyah terhadap sidang isbat pemerintah oleh Kementrian Agama. Dengan metode interview dan dokumentasi, data yang diperoleh divalidasi menggunakan teknik triangulasi sumber dan dianalisa dengan metode miles dan huberman. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa secara fiqh, pegiat falak memposisikan hisab sebagai alat bantu informasi, bukan sebagai dasar tasyri' (penetapan hukum). Ikhbar yang diberikan adalah diseminasi ijtihad ilmiah yang bersifat dzanni (persangkaan kuat) yang tidak mengikat secara hukum. Ikhbar disampaikan dalam rangka menjawab keingintahuan masyarakat agar dapat mempersiapkan psikologis dan logistik dalam menyambut bulan puasa serta Idul Fitri yang berkesesuaian dengan prinsip maslahah. Ponpes al-Ghazaliyah meyakini bahwa hisab dan rukyat bukan dua metode yang saling meniadakan, kan tetapi justru saling melengkapi. Hisab digunakan sebagai alat ilmiah untuk memprediksi kemungkinan terlihat atau tidaknya hilal, sedangkan rukyat digunakan sebagai alat legal-normatif untuk mentukan awal bulan secara syar’i dalam konteks beribadah berjamaah. Adapun penetapan awal bulan Hijriyah tetap merujuk pada keputusan pemerintah yang dihasilkan melalui sidang isbat yang dilaksanakan oleh Kementrian Agama.
Reconstructing Ashʿarite Kalam Methodology through Bayani–Burhani–Irfani Integration: An Integrative Review of Contemporary Sunni Theology Nanang Zamroji; Moh. Asror Yusuf; Zayad Abd. Rahman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8781

Abstract

This article examines methodological renewal in Ashʿarite kalam by developing a more explicit conceptual model of epistemological reconstruction. Using an integrative review, the study analyzes 50 core sources selected from classical theological works, peer-reviewed journal articles, and international academic books published mainly between 2000 and 2026, with classical texts used as foundational references. The review asks how Bayani, Burhani, and irfani epistemologies can be operationalized to transform Ashʿarite kalam from a primarily defensive-dialectical discipline into a reconstructive, dialogical, and ethically responsive theology. In response to the need for clearer library-research reporting, the findings are presented through a coding matrix that maps title/author/year, data source or object, conceptual focus, main findings, and thematic codes. The findings produce a triadic reconstruction model: Bayani functions as textual anchoring, Burhani as rational-coherence testing, and irfani as ethical-spiritual orientation. The novelty of this article lies not in repeating the general integration of Islamic epistemologies, but in translating al-jabiri’s epistemic categories into an operational model for contemporary Ashʿarite theological reasoning. This model clarifies how classical Sunni theology can engage modern issues such as scientific rationality, pluralism, human dignity, and technology ethics without abandoning its doctrinal identity.
Co-Authors M. Adib Hamzawi Moh. Asror Yusuf Nanang Zamroji