Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Corruptio Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS)
Junet Hariyo Setiawan
Universitas Mpu Tantular
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effectiveness of Regulatory Frameworks and Participatory Transparency Approaches in Village Fund Corruption Eradication within Regional Autonomy Junet Hariyo Setiawan; Irwan Sapta Putra; Abdul Rafay
Corruptio Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v6i1.4216

Abstract

Village fund corruption remains a critical issue within Indonesia’s decentralized governance system. Although Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages and Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government establish frameworks for transparency and accountability, their implementation has not effectively curbed corrupt practices. This study analyzes the effectiveness of these regulations in preventing village fund corruption and proposes legal strategies to enhance oversight. Using a normative juridical approach supported by empirical data from Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), the research finds that weak vertical supervision by the Regional Inspectorate, limited community participation, and inadequate administrative capacity among village officials undermine regulatory effectiveness. To address these challenges, the study recommends strengthening participatory audits, adopting context-appropriate digital transparency tools, reforming the institutional role of the Village Consultative Body (BPD), and enforcing stricter legal sanctions. A comprehensive and participatory legal approach is essential to reduce corruption and promote sustainable rural governance.
Rekonstruksi Peran Judex Facti dalam Perkara Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Banding Nomor 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI) Muh Amin Saleh; Junet Hariyo Setiawan
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5569

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the reconstruction of the judex facti role by the High Court in narcotics cases involving law enforcement officials. Using a normative juridical approach, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of Appellate Court Decision Number 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI in the case of Inspector General Teddy Minahasa Putra. The findings reveal that the High Court failed to carry out its corrective function substantively as a judex facti. The study identifies three fundamental weaknesses: first, factual reconstruction was not supported by scientific verification and in-depth evidence analysis; second, there was non-compliance with electronic evidence standards as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law; third, structural bias was evident in handling this institutional case. This research recommends comprehensive reforms in the electronic evidence system through amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), standardization of digital chain of custody, and strengthening the impartiality of appellate courts. The study makes a significant contribution to the development of criminal procedure law in the digital era, particularly regarding the accountability of the appellate judiciary system.
Co-Authors Abdul Rafay Irwan Sapta Putra Muh Amin Saleh