Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURISTA : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum
Muhammad Iqbal
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
POST-CERTIFICATION GOVERNANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF INSPECTORIAL OVERSIGHT AND BUSINESS COMMITMENT IN ACEH’S HALAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Vira Yuniar; Irwansyah; Muhammad Iqbal
JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Centre for Adat and Legal Studies of Aceh Province (CeFALSAP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jurista.v10i1.375

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the LPPOM MPU Aceh supervision system in ensuring business operators’ post-certification commitment to halal certification. The background to the research is the phenomenon of inconsistent compliance by business operators with halal standards, as revealed by the 2023 inspection, which found that 26.4% of 87 businesses in Banda Aceh did not meet halal standards despite holding valid certificates. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, combining primary data from in-depth interviews with LPPOM MPU Aceh officials, halal auditors, and business operators, alongside secondary data from supervision reports and relevant regulations. The research findings indicate that LPPOM MPU Aceh implements a multi-layered supervision mechanism through routine and unannounced inspections, with 39 auditors overseeing 900–1,000 business units. Practices on the ground face complex challenges, including a limited auditor-to-business operator ratio (1:23–26), a lack of operational funding, and a gap in business operators’ understanding of the principles of the Halal Assurance System (SJPH), which reduces the effectiveness of supervision by 20–30% with coverage of only 60–70% of priority targets. Violations identified include the use of non-certified ingredients, cross-contamination, and non-compliance with product composition requirements. This study concludes that although the supervision system based on Aceh Qanun No. 8 of 2016 has served as a structured compliance framework, its effectiveness requires improvement through digital transformation grounded in risk management, institutional capacity building, and the development of a more adaptive supervision model tailored to SME characteristics.
Legal Responsibility of Livestock Owners for Crop Damage: An Analysis of Article 84 (1) Qanun No. 3/2013 in Pidie Jaya Alvi Farisyi; M. Syuib; Muhammad Iqbal; Ming Chou Liu
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v3i1.507

Abstract

The formulation of qanun as a regional legal product should not only regulate administrative matters but also accommodate the living law within society. Article 84 paragraph (1) of Qanun of Pidie Jaya Regency Number 3 of 2013 recognizes that disputes related to livestock and animal health may be resolved through customary mechanisms. However, this recognition raises normative problems because it is not accompanied by clear regulations regarding implementation mechanisms, institutional integration, or the legal status of customary dispute settlements within the formal legal system. From the perspective of legal pluralism theory and legal norm theory, this condition indicates that the provision remains declarative rather than operational. This study aims to analyze the normative construction of the article and formulate a more operational normative reconstruction. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that Article 84 paragraph (1) does not regulate dispute settlement procedures, coordination between customary institutions and regional government authorities, or the legal consequences of customary settlement outcomes. Consequently, its effectiveness relies more on the social legitimacy of customary law than on formal legal structures. This study proposes a normative reconstruction emphasizing procedural clarity, documentation of customary deliberations, and institutional integration to strengthen legal certainty and harmonization between state law and customary law.
Co-Authors Alvi Farisyi Irwansyah M. Syuib Ming Chou Liu Vira Yuniar