Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Journal of Law and Social Politics Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum
Ristina Yudhanti
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Normative Reconstruction of Blacklists in Government Procurement as an Instrument for Building Legal Awareness and Preventing the Practice of ‘Flag Borrowing’ Anggara Rawijayadi; Martitah Martitah; Ristina Yudhanti
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.130

Abstract

Background: Government procurement of goods and services is a strategic instrument in state financial management that must be implemented based on the rule of law, fair competition, and integrity. However, flag-borrowing practices (manifested in bid rigging, the use of falsified documents, and contract management by parties outside the official corporate structure) reveal distortions in the legal identity of business entities within the procurement system. Objective: This article examines the alignment between the conception and practice of blacklists and the principle of the rule of law, and formulates a normative reconstruction based on responsive regulation to sustainably prevent flag-borrowing practices. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, enriched by a socio-legal perspective through a case study of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Results: The analysis shows that the absence of a limitation period, the lack of an explicit obligation for proportionality review, and issues of enforcement temporality create disharmony between the objective of regulatory guidance and the principle of legal certainty. Conclusion: The reconstruction of blacklists should be directed toward five pillars: affirmation of a system-integrity orientation, temporal limitation of sanctions, proportionality review, beneficial ownership transparency, and a compliance-based rehabilitation mechanism. Through this approach, blacklists can be repositioned as a responsive, constitutional, and effective legal guidance instrument for preventing flag-borrowing practices in Indonesian public procurement.
Application of the Dilution Doctrine in Trademark Registration as Legal Protection for Trademarks in Indonesia Pandam Bayu Seto Aji; Martitah Martitah; Ristina Yudhanti
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49132

Abstract

This research examines and analyzes the concept and regulation of the trademark dilution doctrine, which has long developed in the United States, as a form of legal comparison, as well as the implementation of the dilution doctrine in the substantive examination of trademark registration in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical research employing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case study approaches. This study uses secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are then qualitatively analyzed. Data collection techniques involve literature study by tracing widely published written information. The results of this study show that trademark violations in Indonesia are dominated by imitation marks, thereby requiring legal reform in trademark law through the adoption of the dilution doctrine similar to that of the United States. Article 21 paragraph (1)(c) of the Indonesian Trademark and Geographical Indication Law mandates the application of the dilution doctrine, although it does not explicitly regulate it. This indicates that Indonesia has the potential to implement the dilution doctrine. However, the significant differences between the United States and Indonesia make full implementation of the doctrine difficult. One of the main challenges in implementing the dilution doctrine is the communal character of Indonesian society. When analyzed using Jeremy Bentham’s Utilitarianism Theory, the result shows that implementing the dilution doctrine would produce greater pain for Indonesia. Therefore, adjustments and legal formulations are needed to accommodate the interests of all parties, including clear and detailed regulations that govern dispute resolution and evidentiary standards in court. The implementation of the dilution doctrine in substantive examination also needs to be tightened to reduce future trademark disputes.
Peran Bawaslu dalam Penanganan Pemungutan Suara Ulang pada Pemilu 2024 di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Refala Roqi Yatazakka; Ristina Yudhanti
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v5i2.3216

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran dan strategi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) Provinsi Jawa Tengah dalam pengawasan PSU pada Pemilu 2024, serta mengidentifikasi faktor penyebab PSU dan kendala yang dihadapi di lapangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan, analisis dokumen hukum dan wawancara. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa PSU di 30 TPS di 14 kabupaten/kota di Jawa Tengah sebagian besar disebabkan oleh pelanggaran administratif dan kelemahan dalam tata kelola teknis. Bawaslu telah menerapkan strategi berjenjang seperti rapat koordinasi, pelatihan teknis, simulasi pengawasan, serta evaluasi kelembagaan untuk memperkuat pengawasan PSU. Namun demikian, tantangan seperti kurangnya pemahaman teknis pengawas dan lemahnya sistem pencegahan masih menjadi hambatan. Nilai kebaruan dari penelitian ini terletak pada pemetaan konkret terhadap bentuk pelanggaran dan strategi pengawasan PSU berbasis evaluasi empiris. Rekomendasi strategis yang diajukan mencakup penguatan kapasitas SDM pengawas, pemanfaatan teknologi pengawasan, dan reformulasi regulasi teknis yang lebih adaptif terhadap dinamika pemilu.
Co-Authors Anggara Rawijayadi Martitah Pandam Bayu Seto Aji Refala Roqi Yatazakka