<![CDATA[Legal certainty in land tenure is fundamentally compromised by sectoral conflicts between agrarian and forestry law in Indonesia. A major issue is the juridical ambiguity of land status after a Forest Area Relinquishment Decree (Pelepasan Kawasan Hutan) is issued, often leading to disputes where these administrative decrees are contested by Certificates of Ownership (SHM). This research aims to analyze two key problems: 1) the essence and juridical status of land following a Forest Area Relinquishment Decree, and 2) the legal force of this Decree as land ownership evidence. This study employs a normative legal research methodology, which is qualitative, utilizing a statute approach and a descriptive-analytical specification based on library research of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results demonstrate that land post-relinquishment becomes State Land within an Other Use Area (APL), and the Decree is legally recognized as a "basis of land control" (Dasar Penguasaan Atas Tanah). Court decision analysis reveals that the judiciary has, in practice, prioritized these Decrees over subsequently issued SHMs based on chronological priority and procedural challenges within the 5-year limit of Indonesia's negative publicity system. The study concludes that the Relinquishment Decree functions as a valid basis of control and has been judicially affirmed as superior proof of ownership over conflicting SHMs in the analyzed cases. Further research is suggested to analyze the legal status of management authority during the transition period and the impact of the new APL status on pre-existing community rights.Keywords: Land Tenure; Land Status; Forest Area Relinquishment.]]>
