Tiara Anvadilla
Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Quantitative SWOT Analysis of the Detailed Spatial Plan for the Nusantara Capital City East 1 Planning Area Tiara Anvadilla
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jasmi.v3i2.7025

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the internal and external strategic factors shaping implementation of the Detailed Spatial Plan, known as Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR), for the East 1 Planning Area of Indonesia's new capital, Nusantara, and identifies the strategic position and development direction that the plan should pursue.Methodology: A descriptive qualitative and quantitative approach was applied through a quantitative Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, in which internal strength and weakness factors and external opportunity and threat factors were each assigned a weight and a score, multiplied to produce weighted values, and summarized in Internal Factor Analysis Summary and External Factor Analysis Summary matrices.Results: The internal factor matrix produced a total weighted score of 2.93 and the external factor matrix produced a total weighted score of 2.83, placing the plan in the aggressive, growth oriented quadrant of the internal external matrix, where internal strengths and external opportunities outweigh internal weaknesses and external threats.Conclusions: Strong national regulatory backing, the green and smart city concept, integrated spatial and transportation planning, and central government support constitute the plan's principal strengths, while financing needs, infrastructure readiness, and social and environmental risk remain the principal constraints requiring active management.Limitations: The descriptive, cross-sectional design relies on secondary documentary data and expert style weighting rather than primary survey data.Contributions: The study offers a replicable quantitative SWOT framework for evaluating detailed spatial plans in large scale, state led urban development projects.
Strategic Monitoring and Evaluation Practices in Local Government Performance Accountability Systems Tiara Anvadilla
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jasmi.v4.n2.p1-12.2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how monitoring and evaluation practices function within the strategic management cycle of a public organization at the local government level, using the Belitang area of East Ogan Komering Ulu Regency, Indonesia, as the empirical setting. The paper investigates how monitoring and evaluation are implemented, what constraints limit their effectiveness, and how performance accountability can be strengthened.Research Methodology: A qualitative case study design was used, drawing on document analysis of regional planning and performance reports, semi-structured interviews with regional apparatus officials, and thematic analysis guided by an evidencebased performance management framework.Results: The findings show that monitoring and evaluation in the study area remain largely administrative rather than substantive. Four interrelated constraints were identified: limited human resource capacity for analysis, fragmented information systems, a weak organizational evaluation culture, and insufficient follow-up on evaluation findings.Conclusions: Monitoring and evaluation are essential components of strategic management in public organizations, yet their contribution to performance improvement depends on integration with planning, information systems, and organizational learning routines rather than compliance reporting alone.Limitations: The single-site qualitative design limits statistical generalizability, and reliance on retrospective interview accounts introduces potential recall bias.Contributions: The study extends performance management literature by illustrating how national accountability frameworks translate into practice at the sub-district level and offers a practical model for strengthening evaluation utilization in resource-constrained local governments.