p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SWATANTRA
Maryann Schoenberg
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tropical Sovereignty and Climate Governance: Brazil–Indonesia South–South Cooperation in Implementing Nationally Determined Contributions Maryann Schoenberg
SWATANTRA Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/swatantra.23.1.25-36

Abstract

This article examines Brazil–Indonesia climate cooperation as a strategic model of South–South governance among tropical forest countries. Both states occupy pivotal positions in global climate politics because of their extensive biodiversity, large land-use sectors, growing economies, and shared demand for climate justice within the Paris Agreement. Using a qualitative policy analysis of national climate commitments, diplomatic agendas, and contemporary debates on forest governance, the study argues that cooperation between Brazil and Indonesia should move beyond symbolic solidarity toward an implementation-oriented framework. The proposed framework contains five mutually reinforcing pillars: forest and land-use governance, Nationally Determined Contribution implementation and transparency, climate finance and investment diplomacy, low-carbon productive transformation, and just transition with social inclusion. The analysis shows that Brazil’s renewed ecological transformation agenda and Indonesia’s long-term low-carbon development strategy create complementary opportunities for policy learning, technical exchange, and joint advocacy in international negotiations. However, effective cooperation requires stronger institutional coordination, credible emissions data, safeguards for Indigenous peoples and local communities, and financial mechanisms that reduce the asymmetry between climate ambition and domestic development constraints. The article contributes to climate governance scholarship by conceptualising tropical sovereignty not as resistance to global norms, but as a basis for credible, equitable, and development-sensitive climate action. It concludes that Brazil–Indonesia cooperation can strengthen the political voice of the Global South while producing practical pathways for deforestation reduction, green industrialisation, and socially legitimate climate transitions across emerging economies facing similar ecological and fiscal vulnerabilities today globally.
Environmental Justice in Urban Sanitation Policy: Assessing Access, Governance, and Infrastructure Gaps in Rio de Janeiro Maryann Schoenberg
SWATANTRA Vol. 24 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/swatantra.24.1.61-74

Abstract

Urban sanitation is not only a technical service but also a question of public policy, social justice, and democratic governance. This article examines environmental justice in urban sanitation policy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, by assessing access, governance, and infrastructure gaps across the city. Although Rio de Janeiro has relatively high aggregate indicators for water supply and sewerage coverage compared with many Brazilian municipalities, these averages may conceal significant inequalities affecting low-income communities, favelas, peripheral neighbourhoods, and residents exposed to environmental health risks. Using a qualitative case-study design, this article analyses secondary data from national sanitation indicators, the Municipal Basic Sanitation Plan for Water and Sewerage of Rio de Janeiro, census-based information on favelas and urban communities, legal documents, and academic literature on environmental justice and sanitation governance. The findings suggest that Rio de Janeiro’s sanitation challenge is best understood as a multi-dimensional justice problem. First, access indicators have improved, but service regularity, water losses, sewerage quality, affordability, and local infrastructure conditions remain uneven. Second, governance has become more complex following regionalised concessions and the coexistence of multiple operators and regulators across planning areas. Third, infrastructure deficits are spatially and socially concentrated, especially in informal settlements and peripheral zones where sanitation, drainage, housing, and environmental risks overlap. The article argues that environmental justice requires more than expanding networks. It requires transparent monitoring, territorial prioritisation, social participation, affordability safeguards, and integrated planning between sanitation, housing, drainage, public health, and climate adaptation. The study contributes to public administration and environmental engineering debates by showing that equitable sanitation policy must bridge technical infrastructure with institutional accountability and recognition of vulnerable urban populations.