Raghad Hawarin
Hebron University PALESTINE

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The difference between artificial intelligence implicatures and human implicatures in conversation Raghad Hawarin; Dr. Mahmod Eshreateh
Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Mitra Persada Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58881/jllscs.v4i2.475

Abstract

This research investigates the pragmatic differences between conversational implicatures produced by artificial intelligence systems and those generated by humans in everyday conversation. Grounded in Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its four conversational maxims—quantity, quality, relation, and manner—the study analyzes how implicatures emerge, function, and are interpreted in human–human and human–AI "chat GPT" interactions. Adopting a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, the study examines ten conversational exchanges: five human conversations and five AI-based conversations. The analysis reveals that while artificial intelligence can simulate implicature-like meanings, these implicatures often lack intentionality, contextual sensitivity, and shared socio-cultural grounding. In contrast, human implicatures are deeply rooted in communicative intention, contextual awareness, and social norms. The findings contribute to pragmatic studies and human–AI "chat GPT" communication by highlighting the fundamental pragmatic gap between artificial and human conversational behavior.
The difference between artificial intelligence implicatures and human implicatures in conversation Raghad Hawarin; Dr. Mahmod Eshreateh
Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Mitra Persada Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58881/jllscs.v4i2.475

Abstract

This research investigates the pragmatic differences between conversational implicatures produced by artificial intelligence systems and those generated by humans in everyday conversation. Grounded in Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its four conversational maxims—quantity, quality, relation, and manner—the study analyzes how implicatures emerge, function, and are interpreted in human–human and human–AI "chat GPT" interactions. Adopting a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, the study examines ten conversational exchanges: five human conversations and five AI-based conversations. The analysis reveals that while artificial intelligence can simulate implicature-like meanings, these implicatures often lack intentionality, contextual sensitivity, and shared socio-cultural grounding. In contrast, human implicatures are deeply rooted in communicative intention, contextual awareness, and social norms. The findings contribute to pragmatic studies and human–AI "chat GPT" communication by highlighting the fundamental pragmatic gap between artificial and human conversational behavior.