Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review
Komang Febrinayanti Dantes
Postgraduate Program, Department of Law, Ganesha University of Education, Singaraja Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
UTILITARIAN ANALYSIS OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF VILLAGE HEAD NEUTRALITY Gede Ganesha; Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani; Ni Made Anggia Paramesthi Fajar; Komang Febrinayanti Dantes
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i4.2173

Abstract

The 2024 Simultaneous Regional Election (Pilkada) emphasizes the importance of neutrality among village government officials, particularly village heads, in maintaining the integrity and fairness of the democratic process. The repeated violations of village head neutrality in Buleleng Regency, despite administrative sanctions, raise questions about the effectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of village head neutrality by Bawaslu Buleleng from a utilitarian perspective, focusing on social benefits and deterrent effects. The research uses a qualitative normative approach with a statute approach, examining relevant regulations, Bawaslu documents, and academic literature. The results indicate that Bawaslu has carried out its supervisory functions according to regulations through report receipt, verification, clarification, and administrative sanction recommendations. However, the effectiveness of these sanctions is limited, as repeated violations continue to occur. From a utilitarian perspective, sanctions limited to written warnings have not maximized social benefits, such as increased public trust and fair political competition. Enforcement of village head neutrality would be more effective if combined with deterrent sanctions, political education, and legal awareness campaigns. These findings are important for strengthening election supervision strategies and enhancing local democratic quality.
CALCULATION OF FINANCIAL LOSSES IN VILLAGE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS: THE AUTHORITY OF THE REGIONAL INSPECTORATE FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE I Wayan Widiastina; Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani; Komang Febrinayanti Dantes
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i4.2241

Abstract

One of the important principles of good governance is transparent and accountable state financial management. Deviations in financial management can cause state financial losses that can disrupt state stability and reduce public trust. The authority to calculate and determine state financial losses is constitutionally vested in the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). However, in the practice of regional governance, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus, in this case the Regional Inspectorate, is also involved in the audit process related to indications of state financial losses. The problem becomes more complex when this authority is applied to Village Credit Institutions (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa), which are customary financial institutions in Bali Province. This study aims to analyze the concept of state financial losses from an administrative law perspective and examine the authority of the Regional Inspectorate in calculating losses at Village Credit Institutions. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include statutory regulations, legal literature, and relevant scientific articles. The research results indicate that the Regional Inspectorate has the authority to conduct audits and calculate indications of losses as part of the government's internal oversight function, but the authority to determine final state financial losses remains with the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). Therefore, clarity in the regulation of authority is needed to avoid overlapping authority between supervisory institutions.
Co-Authors Gede Ganesha I Wayan Widiastina Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani Ni Made Anggia Paramesthi Fajar