Moza Dela Fudika
Islamic University of Riau

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Analysis of Legal Standing Issues in The Constitutional Court Decision: In The Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Asri Muhammad Saleh; Moza Dela Fudika; Tamim Ripinra Putra
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v4i1.814

Abstract

This research reviews constitutional review at the Constitutional Court (MK), especially in Case No.90/PUU-XXI/2023. The focus is on the applicant's legal standing and the Constitutional Court's considerations in making decisions. Legal standing is a legal right or position that allows a party to file a lawsuit before a court. In the context of material review, the applicant's legal position is the main determinant of the legitimacy of judicial review. Normative legal methods are used in this research to systematically and in-depth analyze the legal framework governing legal standing and the Constitutional Court's interpretation of it in the context of the cases studied. This research discusses the requirements and criteria for legal standing which are regulated in both the law and MK regulations, as well as the MK's interpretation of them in this case. The results show a debate surrounding the consistency, independence, and integrity of the Constitutional Court, especially regarding the controversial decisions received. Criticism emerged regarding the Constitutional Court's approach in assessing legal standing, where there were allegations of inconsistencies, loose assessments, and potentially dubious conflicts of interest. Thus, this research provides in-depth insight into the constitutional review process and the challenges faced by the Constitutional Court in maintaining its authority as an independent and credible constitutional justice institution.
Kehadiran Aplikasi Portal Perlindungan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Esy Kurniasih; Admiral Admiral; Moza Dela Fudika
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i1.8726

Abstract

This study primarily aims to identify the consumer protection portal application based on POJK RI No. 31 /Pojk.07/2020 and, secondary, how the Financial Services Authority may settle consumer disputes and safeguard customers in the financial services industry. The need for this research is urgent since it is the first to address consumer protection in the financial services industry, consumer protection portal applications, and Financial Services Authority consumer dispute resolution. The normative juridical technique is the research methodology used in this study. The explanation above leads one to conclude that Law No. 21 of 2011 establishing the Financial Services Authority's mission is why the consumer protection portal application is available. In the financial services industry, disputes are settled either out-of-court or via the Financial Services Institution first if a settlement cannot be achieved. The recommendations state that, because APPK is still used generically, an upgrade to the system is required to maximize the application of legal protection through the principles of information openness and transparency.   Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari bagaimana portal perlindungan konsumen digunakan sesuai dengan POJK RI No. 31 /Pojk.07/2020, dan bagaimana perlindungan konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Penelitian ini sangat penting karena penelitian sebelumnya belum membahas topik ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif. Adapun kesimpulan dari diskusi di atas, undang-undang No. 21 tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan memungkinkan portal perlindungan konsumen. Jika sengketa di sektor jasa keuangan tidak diselesaikan melalui Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, mereka akan dilanjutkan dengan penyelesaian di pengadilan atau di luar pengadilan. Rekomendasi mengenai praktik APPK masih banyak digunakan, dan sistem harus diperbarui untuk memaksimalkan penerapan perlindungan hukum melalui prinsip keterbukaan dan transparansi informasi.