Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Lex Scientia Law Review
Aulia Khansa Nabila
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Karya Kecerdasan Buatan Italian Brainrot Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Aulia Khansa Nabila; Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/0mj44163

Abstract

This research aims to analyze one of the works produced by artificial intelligence, specifically Italian Brainrot, in the field of image-based creations. The use of artificial intelligence technology brings its own challenges in the field of copyright law, as it gives rise to a fundamental legal uncertainty regarding whether works generated by artificial intelligence can be categorized as "creations" protected by copyright under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The method used is normative juridical with a literature study approach, referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright and other related regulations. The research findings indicate that works produced entirely by the Italian Brainrot artificial intelligence cannot obtain copyright protection in Indonesia. This is because Italian Brainrot's AI-generated works do not meet the requirements for a creation to be eligible for copyright protection, namely originality, creativity, and embodiment. Italian Brainrot has not fulfilled the requirement of human authorship and human creativity, and therefore cannot yet obtain copyright protection.
Exploring the Feasibility of a Special Electoral Court to Achieve Electoral Justice Septi Nur Wijayanti; Putri Anggia; Kelik Iswandi; Aulia Khansa Nabila
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v10i1.26985

Abstract

The increasing complexity and quantity of election disputes require a fairer, more transparent, independent, and quality settlement mechanism. Many Indonesian experts expressed support for the establishment of an electoral court because the existing dispute resolution mechanism lacked a sense of justice. Therefore, this study aims to address these problems through normative legal analysis using statutory and conceptual methods. To obtain comparative perspectives and relevant institutional models for the Indonesian context, we conducted a comparative study of electoral court practices in several Latin American countries. The results show that the debate surrounding the establishment of a special electoral court is seen as an initiative to promote fairness in resolving disputes. The Election Court provides legal certainty for justice seekers and eliminates the multi-institutional settlement of violations and conflicts. This is a strategic step to integrate dispute resolution that has been spread across various institutions (General Election Supervisory Agency, General Election Organizer Honorary Council, and Constitutional Court). The potential for this integration lies in enhancing the credibility of election results and minimizing authority overlap.  This article offers integrative design ideas in resolving election disputes. This will ensure that substantial electoral justice is achieved, rather than just procedural justice. Thus, the Election Court is not only a new judicial instrument but also a representation of paradigm transformation in realizing substantial electoral justice in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Kelik Iswandi Putri Anggia Septi Nur Wijayanti Yudho Taruno Muryanto