p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Animha Law Journal
Whulan Putria Nanda
Universitas Andalas Padang Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Hukum Sistem Resi Gudang Sebagai Jaminan Kebendaan Serta Urgensi Peran Notaris Dalam Mewujudkan Pembiayaan Nasional Yang Berkeadilan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2654 K/PDT/2011) Yohanes Wato Lewar; Whulan Putria Nanda; Seroja Dwina; Siti Kheirani Lubnayya; Nidia Aliza Kasnu Harda
Animha Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Animha Law Journal
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/alj.v3i1.249

Abstract

The Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) is a legal instrument developed to expand access to commodity-based financing, particularly for farmers and business actors in the agricultural sector, through the utilization of warehouse receipts as objects of collateral. Although governed by Law Number 9 of 2006 as amended by Law Number 9 of 2011 concerning the Warehouse Receipt System, its implementation still faces various issues related to the legal certainty of the position of warehouse receipts as proprietary collateral and legal protection for the parties involved. This research aims to analyze the legal arrangements of the Warehouse Receipt System as a collateral institution, the forms of legal protection for the parties, and its application in Supreme Court Decision Number 2654 K/Pdt/2011. This research employs a normative juridical research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, analyzed descriptively-analytically using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results indicate that normatively, the Warehouse Receipt System has provided a legal basis for the use of warehouse receipts as objects of proprietary collateral. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, including the suboptimal application of the principles of legal certainty and legal protection, infrastructure limitations, low literacy among business actors, and the lack of uniform acceptance of warehouse receipts as collateral by banking institutions. Supreme Court Decision Number 2654 K/Pdt/2011 demonstrates that the rights of creditors holding warehouse receipt collateral have not received optimal protection when the collateral object becomes a dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to synchronize regulations with national collateral laws, strengthen the warehouse receipt registration mechanism, and optimize the authority of notaries in drafting deeds of collateral imposition.
TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI TERHADAP KERUGIAN PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS(Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3017 K/Pdt/2011) Yohanes Wato Lewar; Whulan Putria Nanda; Bisri Fadil Hasan
Animha Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Animha Law Journal
Publisher : Astha Grafika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65675/alj.v3i1.250

Abstract

Perseroan Terbatas (PT) sebagai badan hukum kerap menjadi arena konflik kepentingan antara pemegang saham mayoritas dan pemegang saham minoritas, khususnya dalam konteks pemisahan kepemilikan dan pengelolaan perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis: (1) perlindungan hukum pemegang saham minoritas melalui mekanisme pemeriksaan perseroan berdasarkan Pasal 138 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT); (2) implementasi perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3017 K/Pdt/2011; dan (3) peran notaris dalam mencegah pelanggaran hak-hak pemegang saham minoritas dalam kerangka tindakan hukum korporasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3017 K/Pdt/2011 merupakan landmark decision yang memperkuat hak substantif beneficial owner yang berinvestasi melalui kustodian, mengafirmasi penghitungan kumulatif kepemilikan saham untuk memenuhi ambang batas sepuluh persen Pasal 138 UUPT, serta menegaskan bahwa pemeriksaan perseroan merupakan instrumen perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas yang efektif ketika pemegang saham mayoritas menyalahgunakan dominasinya. Direksi PT Sumalindo Lestari Jaya Tbk terbukti melanggar prinsip fiduciary duty, duty of disclosure, dan good corporate governance melalui transaksi-transaksi materiil yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan RUPS. Dalam konteks ini, peran notaris tidak semata-mata bersifat instrumental sebagai pembuat akta, melainkan juga bersifat preventif dalam memastikan legalitas tindakan korporasi, perlindungan hak pemegang saham minoritas, dan penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam setiap akta autentik tindakan korporasi.