Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Independent
Yennita Astarina
Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Cancellation of the Maanyan Dayak Traditional Engagement Agreement Rosella Frianty; Febri Noor Hediati; Siti kotijah; Yennita Astarina; Ine Ventyrina; Hairan
Jurnal Independent Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v14i1.420

Abstract

A proposal of marriage is an attempt to bring together a man and a woman with the consent of both parties, who mutually promise to marry. The purpose of this study is to examine the implications of canceling a proposal of marriage based on the customary law of the Dayak Maanyan tribe. This study uses a non-doctrinal or socio-legal research approach through qualitative interviews with traditional leaders, processing data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal implication of canceling a proposal of marriage in the Dayak Maanyan tradition is a customary sanction called sapu hirang, which is determined by the traditional leader. However, if the cancellation is for legitimate reasons, such as inappropriate behavior by one of the parties, the traditional leader can provide special consideration and adjust the sanctions imposed.
Legal Certainty Regarding the Material Value of Trademark Rights Certificates for UMKM Business Actors as Objects of Banking Guarantees Febri Noor Hediati; Sulung Nugroho; Yennita Astarina; Dewi Atriani; Karenditha Virdara Suwarnie; Nandia Khalimatus Sa’diyah
Jurnal Independent Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v14i1.422

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal status of trademark certificates as banking collateral and to examine the legal certainty of their material value in credit financing under Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022 on the Creative Economy. This research adopts an empirical qualitative approach combined with normative legal analysis through statutory review, legal literature, and in-depth interviews with Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), financial institutions, and the Financial Services Authority. The data were analyzed descriptively to identify gaps between legal norms and practical implementation. The findings indicate that, legally, trademark certificates are recognized as intangible movable assets that may be used as fiduciary security; however, legal certainty regarding their material value remains insufficient. The main constraints include the absence of clear execution mechanisms, high valuation risk due to the subjective and volatile nature of trademark value, and the dependence of trademark value on the debtor’s business continuity. Furthermore, limited awareness among business actors and the lack of readiness of banking institutions to accept intangible assets as collateral widen the gap between regulation and practice. This study recommends harmonizing collateral law and intellectual property regulations, establishing standardized trademark valuation guidelines, and strengthening institutional capacity of financial institutions and business actors to support effective and sustainable intellectual property-based financing.
Co-Authors Dewi Atriani Febri Noor Hediati Hairan Ine Ventyrina Karenditha Virdara Suwarnie Nandia Khalimatus Sa’diyah Rosella Frianty Siti kotijah Sulung Nugroho