Anton Sujatmiko
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS DALAM KASUS PEMBUATAN DUA AKTA DENGAN OBJEK YANG SAMA: PERSPEKTIF ETIKA DAN HUKUM ( ANALISIS HUKUM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NO.27/PDT.G / 2022/PN.LMJ  JO PENGADILAN TINGGI SURABAYA NO. 54 /PDT/2023/PT.SBY Anton Sujatmiko; Muhammad Mustain
Jurnal Argumentum Vol 2 No 1 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : STIH Jenderal Sudirman Lumajang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66501/argumentum.v2i1.31

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pertanggungjawaban notaris atas pembuatan dua akta autentik dengan objek sama, dilihat dari perspektif etika profesi dan hukum positif. Fenomena ini serius karena berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa dan merusak kepercayaan publik. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, mengkaji Putusan PN Lumajang No. 27/Pdt.G/2022 jo. PT Surabaya No. 54/PDT/2023. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tindakan notaris melanggar Kode Etik dan UU No. 2/2014 (UUJN), khususnya asas kehati-hatian, independensi, dan kewajiban menjaga keaslian data. Secara hukum, notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban perdata (Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata) dan dikenai sanksi administratif serta etik. Dari sisi etika, tindakan ini melanggar nilai moral profesi, menuntut integritas, kejujuran, dan tanggung jawab. Kesimpulannya, pembuatan dua akta dengan objek sama merusak martabat profesi dan prinsip officium nobile, sehingga diperlukan pengawasan dan pembinaan etika profesi berkelanjutan.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR COMPOSERS OF SONGS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ANTON SUJATMIKO
LOIS: JURNAL HUKUM DAN HUMANIORA Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Aksara Cendikia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to uphold copyright protection, as copyright represents the creative works of individuals or groups and recognizes their achievements through legal recognition. It is expected that creators will be protected under Law Number 28 of 2014, particularly Article 40 paragraph (3), which regulates the protection of works that have not been published or announced but have been realized in tangible form. However, this provision still creates ambiguity, especially regarding copyrights that have not been formally registered. This research employs a normative juridical method with a legislative approach. The findings demonstrate that the concept of legal protection for song copyrights that remain unregistered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights (DJKI) but have already been published to the public still requires greater legal certainty. The author investigated relevant legal regulations and laws to explain the legal consequences for song creators whose works contain elements of similarity or have been plagiarized by third parties. While Law Number 28 of 2014 establishes a framework for copyright protection, there is currently no legal certainty guaranteeing protection for works that have not been registered with copyright authorities. This is because the concept of exclusive rights as inherent and natural rights provides the meaning that such rights serve as a guarantee for every creator to obtain legal protection.