Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Khoirul Tamam
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Issues Regarding the Procedures and Requirements for Filing Lawsuits in Administrative Courts and Their Implications for Legal Certainty Raga Bahira Albantani; Khoirul Tamam; Rayhan Ade Dwiyana; Raenita Aulia Dewi; Dalva Aulia Apandi; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/hf6yhv83

Abstract

This study examines the legal issues surrounding the procedures and requirements for filing lawsuits before the Indonesian State Administrative Court and analyzes their implications for legal certainty. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of legislation governing administrative adjudication, government administration, and electronic court proceedings, while secondary materials include administrative law scholarship and contemporary studies on procedural justice and legal certainty. The analysis reveals that procedural requirements serve an important function in maintaining orderly adjudication and ensuring predictability within administrative litigation. At the same time, several normative ambiguities continue to affect the admissibility of claims, particularly regarding the expanded concept of administrative decisions, the obligation to exhaust administrative remedies, and the application of dismissal mechanisms. These issues often result in procedural barriers that prevent substantive judicial examination. The study further finds that judicial digitalization has strengthened procedural efficiency and accessibility but has also generated new challenges related to technological compliance, procedural fairness, and digital legal certainty. The findings indicate that a coherent interpretative framework and adaptive procedural reform are essential for balancing procedural discipline, effective judicial protection, and substantive justice within the Indonesian administrative court system.
Copyright Protection in NFT Transactions Involving Blockchain-Based Digital Assets Ade Lukman Firmansyah; Aldo Delano; Khoirul Tamam; Fenny Fatriany
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/d7et4c54

Abstract

The rapid expansion of blockchain technology and the emergence of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have transformed digital ownership models and generated significant challenges for contemporary copyright law. This study examines the legal relationship between NFT ownership and copyright protection, analyzes the legal issues arising from blockchain-based digital asset transactions, and evaluates the regulatory implications for Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research design with conceptual, comparative, and doctrinal approaches, the study analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature concerning NFTs, blockchain governance, and intellectual property rights. The findings indicate that NFT ownership does not automatically transfer copyright ownership of the underlying digital work, creating substantial legal uncertainty regarding licensing, royalty distribution, authorship recognition, and rights enforcement. Although blockchain technology offers innovative mechanisms for authentication, traceability, and automated royalty management through smart contracts, these technological features remain insufficient to resolve fundamental legal questions concerning copyright ownership and infringement. The study further identifies regulatory gaps within Indonesia’s existing legal framework, particularly the inability of current copyright and digital transaction regulations to adequately address decentralized digital asset ecosystems. The research recommends regulatory reform focused on clarifying ownership rights, strengthening copyright protection mechanisms, and developing adaptive governance frameworks capable of accommodating technological innovation while ensuring legal certainty.
Co-Authors Ade Lukman Firmansyah Aldo Delano Dalva Aulia Apandi Fenny Fatriany Raenita Aulia Dewi Raga Bahira Albantani Rayhan Ade Dwiyana Taufiq Alamsyah