Faridatul Jannah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Analisis Kinerja Recursive Feature Elimination pada Support Vector Machine untuk Klasifikasi Penyakit Stroke pada Data Tidak Seimbang Faridatul Jannah; Siska Kurnia Gusti; Elin Haerani; Teddie Darmizal
Bulletin of Computer Science Research Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i4.1147

Abstract

Stroke is a non-communicable disease with high mortality and disability rates, necessitating a classification approach that can facilitate more effective detection. Class imbalance in stroke datasets causes classification models to be biased toward the majority class, resulting in suboptimal classification performance. This study aims to analyze the performance of Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) in a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model with data imbalance handling using Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) in stroke classification. The dataset used is a secondary dataset from Kaggle consisting of 5109 data points after the preprocessing stage. The modeling process was conducted by testing various data split ratios as well as combinations of kernels and SVM parameters using a 5-fold cross-validation approach. The results show that the best model was obtained with an 80:20 split ratio, a polynomial kernel, and a C parameter of 0.1, yielding an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.14, recall of 0.82, an F1-score of 0.24, and an AUC of 0.8245. The application of RFE resulted in improved model performance compared to without RFE, although the magnitude of the improvement was relatively small. The still low precision value indicates that the model still produces many false positives, so the classification challenge on the stroke dataset has not been fully resolved. On the other hand, an AUC value of 0.8245 indicates that the model performs reasonably well in distinguishing between the two classes overall, although its application in a clinical context still requires further refinement.