Mukhamad Luthfan Setiaji
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Politik Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tentang Desa Mukhamad Luthfan Setiaji
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7063

Abstract

The state has explicitly acknowledged the existence of villages and indigenous groups through the Law from past till the present. The most recent revision to the village regulations, Law Number 3 of 2024 concerning the Second revision to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, has drawn a lot of attention from many facets of society. The People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) wants the second amendment draft to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages to be approved prior to the general election (Pemilu) in 2024, even though the most recent village regulations are not part of the priority National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) for 2023. It is fascinating to examine the legal politics and urgency involved in the creation of Law Number 3 of 2024, which amends Law Number 6 of 2014 about villages in the second place. Normative legal research employing secondary data sources and qualitative descriptive analytical methodologies is the research methodology employed in this work. The study's findings suggest that political factors and the need for quick changes to the legislation do not substantially alter the content of earlier rules.
Tinjauan Yuridis Hukuman Disiplin Bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil Yang Menerima Gratifikasi Mukhamad Luthfan Setiaji
Jurnal JURISTIC Vol 6, No 02 (2025): Jurnal JURISTIC
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jrs.v6i02.6999

Abstract

The capacity to adhere to duties and stay clear of restrictions outlined in statutory regulations is known as civil servant discipline. Accepting gifts associated with their position, such as gratuities, is prohibited for civil officers. Civil servant penalties will be imposed on civil servants who break the restrictions as stipulated in the statute. Utilising secondary data sources and qualitative analysis methodologies, the study employed the normative juridical research method. The findings demonstrated that federal servants would face disciplinary action if they accepted gifts or gratuities associated with their position. Everyone would face harsh disciplinary action, including dishonourable discharge, if it were established that you had broken the rules.