Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Sawitri Yuli Hartati S
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Sistem Pembuktian dalam Arbitrase Syariah di Indonesia: Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 dan BASYARNAS Lintang Mahapuan Syahbana Tarekat; Sheira Syaharani Kuan; Sawitri Yuli Hartati S
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/dhbn2944

Abstract

This research examines the evidentiary system in Islamic arbitration in Indonesia based on Law Number 30 of 1999 and the practice of the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). The study aims to analyze the normative framework governing evidence in Islamic arbitration, the types and probative value of evidentiary instruments applied, and the legal standing of BASYARNAS within the national judicial system. Using normative juridical research methods, this study focuses on statutory regulations, doctrinal legal analysis, and the integration of Islamic legal principles with national arbitration law. The findings indicate that the evidentiary system in Islamic arbitration is characterized by procedural flexibility that allows arbitrators to prioritize substantive justice while remaining within the boundaries of positive law. Documentary evidence, witness testimony, expert opinions, party admissions, and electronic evidence are recognized and assessed through a combination of legal validity and Sharia-based ethical considerations. Furthermore, BASYARNAS holds strong legal legitimacy as an arbitration institution, supported by statutory recognition, regulatory frameworks, and its complementary relationship with the Religious Courts in the execution of arbitral awards. This integration strengthens Islamic arbitration as a credible and effective dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia’s plural legal system.
Prosedur Berperkara dalam Sistem Arbitrase: Studi perbandingan antara BANI dan BASYARNAS Reviana Putri Fadillah; Zihan Fauziah; Sawitri Yuli Hartati S
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/w3x8vc85

Abstract

This study examines the procedural framework governing dispute resolution before the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS), focusing on how both institutions construct and implement their respective adjudication stages. The analysis highlights that BANI operates with a highly systematized set of procedural guidelines supported by detailed administrative mechanisms, offering clarity and predictability for parties involved in commercial disputes. BASYARNAS, in contrast, integrates sharia principles into its procedural model, resulting in a hybrid structure that aligns national arbitration law with substantive Islamic legal norms, particularly in matters arising from muamalah-based contractual relationships. Both systems share the objective of providing efficient, confidential, and enforceable dispute settlement processes, yet the procedural differences observed demonstrate the need for further harmonization. Strengthening standardization, enhancing transparency, and improving institutional synergy between the two models may contribute to a more coherent national arbitration landscape. The findings provide an analytical foundation for future policy development and institutional refinement within Indonesia’s arbitration system.
Penalaran Arbiter: Standar Penilaian Bukti dalam Arbitrase Syariah Audrey Naanthali Saputra; Anita Dewi; Sawitri Yuli Hartati S
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/avzvzt29

Abstract

This research examines the evidentiary process in sharia arbitration, particularly within the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS), by employing a normative juridical approach. The study focuses on analyzing written legal norms and legal principles governing evidence in sharia arbitration, as regulated under Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Law Number 21 of 2008 on Sharia Banking, and the BASYARNAS Procedural Rules. Primary legal materials consist of statutory regulations and relevant arbitration decisions, while secondary and tertiary materials include legal literature, academic journals, and legal dictionaries. The collected data are analyzed using descriptive-analytical methods and a comparative approach to identify differences between general arbitration and sharia arbitration evidentiary standards. The findings indicate that the evidentiary framework in sharia arbitration reflects flexibility and efficiency while adhering to sharia principles. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, particularly concerning the clarity of evidentiary standards and the adaptation to contemporary forms of evidence. Strengthening regulatory harmonization is therefore essential to enhance legal certainty and effectiveness in resolving sharia economic disputes through arbitration.
IMPLEMENTATION OF CASH WAQF IN INDONESIAN SYARIAH BANK IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW 41/2004 AND SHARIA BUSINESS LAW Mohamad Idham; Sawitri Yuli Hartati S; Sadath M. Nur
International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JANUARY
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20020411

Abstract

Cash waqf is an Islamic philanthropic instrument with strategic potential in strengthening an inclusive and sustainable economy, particularly in the post-pandemic period. In Indonesia, cash waqf has gained legal legitimacy through Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf and the support of a fatwa from the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council. However, there is a gap between the potential of cash waqf and its implementation in Islamic financial institutions. This study aims to analyze the implementation of cash waqf at Bank Syariah Indonesia and assess its contribution to the development of Islamic business law in Indonesia. This study uses an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach, through an analysis of laws and regulations, fatwas, policy documents, and cash waqf management practices. The results show that normatively, the implementation of cash waqf is in accordance with positive law and Sharia principles. However, substantively, its management is not optimal in supporting real sector financing and empowering the community's economy. The main obstacles include low literacy in cash waqf, limited professionalism of nazhir (managers), and suboptimal technical regulations. This research emphasizes the need for strengthening regulations, increasing institutional capacity, and synergy between authorities so that cash waqf functions optimally as a legal instrument for socially just sharia business.
Co-Authors Anita Dewi Audrey Naanthali Saputra Lintang Mahapuan Syahbana Tarekat Mohamad Idham Reviana Putri Fadillah Sadath M. Nur Sheira Syaharani Kuan Zihan Fauziah