Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Journal of Management and Informatics Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Sri Yulianingsih
Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer, Semarang, Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Assessing Legal Consistency in Decentralized Policy Implementation Across Newly Established Regions Sri Yulianingsih
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/p66nv369

Abstract

The concept of decentralization has gained popularity as a means to enhance regional self-governance, but the most recent regions established must cope with the challenge of legal consistency in policy application. The objective of the current research is to evaluate the legal consistency of decentralized policy implementations in newly created regions by examining the relationship between the national government's legal norms and local policy practices in these areas. The research employs a qualitative socio-legal method, using a comparative case study approach involving some newly autonomous regions. The data for the research were gathered through analysis of legal documents, policy records, and in-depth interviews with key regional policy actors; the researchers also used thematic and comparative analyses to work through the data. The results of the research show that legal consistency remains irregular, with inconsistencies occurring mainly during implementation rather than in the drafting stage. Differences in institutional capacity and varying understandings of legal responsibilities are the main factors driving these inconsistencies. The study makes a significant contribution to the understanding of decentralization by placing the spotlight on legal consistency as a crucial bridge between the normative frameworks and policy practice. It recommends that the effective functioning of decentralization depends not only on coherent legal arrangements but also on strong institutional mechanisms to ensure consistent implementation at the regional level. 
Explainable AI-Driven Strategic Decision-Making in SMEs: Simulation-Based Evaluation of Ethical Governance Noah Benjamin; Sri Yulianingsih; Isabella Marie
Journal of Management and Informatics Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): April Season | JMI: Journal of Management and Informatics
Publisher : University of Science and Computer Technology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jmi.v3i1.314

Abstract

Given resource constraints and competitive pressures, we would have expected most SMEs to focus on the performance of AI over ethics. Our findings, however, ran squarely against those expectations and forced us to revise our assumptions about technological adoption in the smaller enterprise. Digital transformation in SMEs is not just about technology adoption; it is about trust building and organizational learning. While AI affords significant advantages in terms of competitiveness, the "black-box" nature of AI generates accountability gaps in ways that hit small businesses harder because they have limited capacity to absorb risk. Our study illustrates precisely how the integration of Explainable AI with digital ethics shifts decision quality in unexpected ways, to the benefit of both ethical compliance and business performance. Drawing on advanced simulation modeling and realistic synthetic data that represents SME scenarios, we compared three competing approaches: pure black-box AI, XAI without ethical safeguards, and XAI with full ethical integration. We were surprised by how the integrated approach improved not only ethical metrics but also improved strategic outcomes along many dimensions, such as in fairness, transparency, and decision quality. We provide a practical, evidence-based framework that guides SMEs through AI adoption via safe simulation environments, thereby avoiding expensive mistakes in the real world while systematically fostering stakeholder trust and organizational capability.
Konstruksi Diskresi Jaksa dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif: Studi Grounded Theory pada Perkara Pidana Umum Maulana Fahmi Idris; Sri Yulianingsih; Poppy Fitrijanti Soeparan
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): JULI: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik (JAKSA)
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/djmkyv34

Abstract

This study aims to develop a substantive theory explaining the construction of prosecutorial discretion in the termination of prosecution under restorative justice in Indonesia. Although restorative justice has increasingly been incorporated into contemporary criminal justice systems, the mechanisms through which prosecutors construct and legitimize decisions to discontinue prosecution remain insufficiently understood. Using a grounded theory approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and theoretical sampling. Data analysis was conducted through iterative stages of initial coding, focused coding, and theoretical coding until theoretical saturation was achieved. The findings reveal that prosecutorial discretion does not operate as a linear administrative procedure but rather as a dynamic and recursive multi-rationality causal system. The study develops a theoretical model termed the Structured Tension–Based Restorative Rationality Mechanism (ST-RRM) , which explains that prosecutorial decisions emerge through the interaction of legal thresholds, restorative validation, relational legitimacy, institutional constraints, and prosecutorial professional identity. The findings indicate that restorative rationality becomes the dominant decision-making logic when three key conditions are simultaneously satisfied: legal eligibility, socially validated victim restoration, and relational legitimacy. Nevertheless, the decision-making process remains embedded within structural constraints, allowing outcomes to be continuously reassessed through institutional and social feedback mechanisms. This study contributes to the literature on prosecutorial discretion by introducing a multi-rationality structured tension theory , conceptualizing discretion as a socio-institutional construction process that integrates legal certainty, victim restoration, and social legitimacy within an adaptive decision-making system.
Co-Authors Isabella Marie Maulana Fahmi Idris Noah Benjamin Poppy Fitrijanti Soeparan