Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

FROM CEREMONY TO RESPONSIBILITY: OATH OF OFFICE AS AMANAH IN THE MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS Gasim Yamani; Fatimawali Fatimawali
Tadayun: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/tadayun.v6i2.525

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the oath of office within the bureaucracy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Central Sulawesi and reconstructs its meaning as an entrusted responsibility (amanah) with legal, ethical, and social consequences. Employing a socio-legal approach, this research analyzes the oath of office not only as a normative legal requirement but also as a living legal norm operating within bureaucratic practices. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with civil servants, observation of oath-taking ceremonies, and document analysis. The findings reveal a significant gap between legal norms and bureaucratic practices, where the oath of office is predominantly perceived as a formal and ceremonial procedure rather than a continuous ethical commitment. From the perspective of legal effectiveness theory, this condition reflects weaknesses in legal culture, organizational environment, and enforcement mechanisms rather than deficiencies in legal substance. Furthermore, this study conceptualizes the oath of office as a form of public trust that aligns with the fiduciary relationship doctrine in modern law and the Islamic concept of amanah. The research contributes theoretically by integrating socio-legal analysis with Islamic legal ethics and practically by offering a reconstruction of the oath of office to strengthen bureaucratic integrity, accountability, and ethical governance. Abstrak Penelitian ini mengkaji efektivitas sumpah jabatan dalam birokrasi Kementerian Agama Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah serta merekonstruksi pemaknaannya sebagai amanah yang melahirkan konsekuensi hukum, etika, dan sosial. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis hukum untuk menganalisis sumpah jabatan tidak hanya sebagai norma hukum formal, tetapi juga sebagai hukum yang bekerja dalam praktik birokrasi. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan aparatur sipil negara, observasi prosesi sumpah jabatan, dan studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma hukum dan praktik birokrasi, di mana sumpah jabatan cenderung dipahami sebagai prosedur seremonial, bukan sebagai komitmen etis yang berkelanjutan. Dalam perspektif teori efektivitas hukum, kondisi ini lebih disebabkan oleh lemahnya budaya hukum, lingkungan organisasi, dan mekanisme penegakan, bukan oleh kekurangan substansi hukum. Penelitian ini juga menempatkan sumpah jabatan sebagai hubungan kepercayaan publik yang sejalan dengan doktrin fiduciary relationship dalam hukum modern dan konsep amanah dalam hukum Islam. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini memperkaya kajian hukum ekonomi syariah melalui integrasi analisis sosio-legal dan etika Islam, serta secara praktis menawarkan rekonstruksi sumpah jabatan untuk memperkuat integritas dan akuntabilitas birokrasi.
Critical Thinking in the Age of Technology from the Perspective of the Qur'an: A Study of Thematic Interpretation Siti Amanah Istiqamah; Tamrin Tamrin; Kamridah Kamridah; Gasim Yamani
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jis.v6i3.57017

Abstract

The development of digital technology has significantly altered how humans access, process, and evaluate information, reshaping reflection and critical evaluation in modern life. This study examines the concept of critical thinking from a Qur'anic perspective through a thematic (maudhu'i) interpretation approach, focusing on tafakkur and its relevance in the digital era. Using a qualitative library research method, data was analyzed through Peter A. Facione's critical thinking framework, encompassing interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and self-regulation as analytical instruments to read the structure of tafakkur. The results indicate that tafakkur reflects a holistic critical thinking structure that integrates cognitive, spiritual, and epistemological dimensions. Furthermore, the reconstruction of human-machine cognitive relations requires not only modern critical thinking structures but also ethical Qur'anic values. Three primary pillars were identified (mujahadah, tabayyun, and amanah) which function as epistemic and ethical mechanisms to regulate human dependence on technology, ensuring cognitive and spiritual responsibility. Additionally, the Qur'anic concept of taskhir serves as a normative foundation positioning artificial intelligence as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human intellectual capacity. Thus, this study concludes that integrating tafakkur, Facione’s theory, and the principles of mujahadah, tabayyun, and amanah establishes a new conceptual framework for understanding Qur'anic critical thinking epistemology in the digital era.