Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tabayyanu : Journal of Islamic Law Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Muhammad Hidayat
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Use of Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah in The Ijtihad of Imam Ash-Shafi’i Muhammad Hidayat
Tabayyanu : Journal Of Islamic Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Dar Arrisyah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66174/935h9048

Abstract

The position of Imam al-Shafi'i regarding al-maslahah al-mursalah remains one of the most debated issues in Islamic legal theory. While the dominant view maintains that he rejected al-maslahah al-mursalah as an independent legal source, other scholars argue that he implicitly applied it through his legal reasoning. Existing studies primarily focus on determining whether Imam al-Shafi'i accepted or rejected al-maslahah al-mursalah, but they have not sufficiently explained the epistemological relationship between qiyas and al-maslahah al-mursalah within his legal methodology. This study aims to reconstruct that relationship by examining Imam al-Shafi'i's theory of qiyas and its application in selected fiqh cases. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, historical, and usul al-fiqh approaches, this study analyzes classical legal sources and relevant contemporary scholarship through qualitative and interpretative methods. The findings demonstrate that Imam al-Shafi'i rejected al-maslahah al-mursalah only as an autonomous legal proof (dalil mustaqill), while substantively integrating considerations of public welfare into the methodological structure of qiyas through the identification of 'illah and al-ma'na. Accordingly, maslahah functions not as an independent source of law but as the internal normative logic guiding analogical reasoning toward the realization of justice and the objectives of the Sharia (maqasid al-shari'ah). The novelty of this study lies in reconstructing Imam al-Shafi'i's legal methodology into an integrated epistemological model linking revelation, 'illah, al-ma'na, qiyas, and maslahah. This reconstruction contributes to contemporary usul al-fiqh scholarship by providing a more coherent framework for understanding Shafi'i legal reasoning and its relevance to addressing modern legal issues while maintaining fidelity to revealed sources.
Overthinking pada Generasi Z dalam Kerangka Psikologi Al-Qur’an: Distingsi antara Tafakkur, Waswas, dan Qalq Mutiara Fahliza; Muhammad Hidayat; Siti Ismahani
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/mft2v764

Abstract

The phenomenon of overthinking among Generation Z is intensifying alongside mounting academic, social, and digital pressures; however, modern psychological approaches often frame it merely as a cognitive symptom, overlooking deeper spiritual dimensions. This paper aims to establish conceptual distinctions between tafakkur, waswas, and qalq within the framework of Qur’anic psychology to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mental dynamics of the contemporary generation. A qualitative, library-based approach was employed, utilizing the thematic exegesis mawḍūʻī method combined with semantic and conceptual analyses of key Qur’anic terms. The results reveal clear differentiations: tafakkur functions as constructive cognitive reflection directed toward meaning and wisdom; waswas emerges as a repetitive, irrational cognitive distortion that undermines self-integration; and qalq represents an affective manifestation—an inner restlessness rooted in an imbalance between cognition and spirituality. Together, these three form an interconnected spectrum of mental experiences, yet each possesses distinct epistemic and functional characteristics. These findings underscore the capacity of the Qur’anic psychological framework to provide a more holistic and integrative conceptual classification capable of bridging cognitive and affective dimensions in the understanding of overthinking, while simultaneously paving the way for the development of psychological intervention models grounded in Qur’anic values ​​systematically and contextually.
Co-Authors Mutiara Fahliza Siti Ismahani