Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Fusion : Journal of Research in Engineering, Technology and Applied Sciences
Nur Ferdiansyah
Universitas Nurul Huda
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Materials Science & Nanotechnology

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Analysis of Naïve Bayes and Random Forest Algorithms for Sentiment Classification of Akulaku User Reviews Nur Ferdiansyah; Ariel Mutia Salsabila; Putri Wiji Lestari
Fusion : Journal of Research in Engineering, Technology and Applied Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Fusion - April
Publisher : PT. Faaslib Serambi Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66341/fusion.v3i1.342

Abstract

Abstract User reviews of the Akulaku application on Google Play Store contain important information regarding user satisfaction and complaints. This study compares the performance of Naïve Bayes and Random Forest algorithms in classifying sentiment into three classes: positive, negative, and neutral. A total of 2,000 Indonesian-language reviews were collected using web scraping techniques. Data were processed through case folding, cleaning, normalization, stopword removal, tokenizing, and stemming. Labeling was based on user ratings. After preprocessing, 1,953 data points remained with an imbalanced distribution; SMOTE was applied to balance each class to 1,114 samples. TF-IDF was used for feature weighting with an 80:20 train-test split. Results showed Random Forest achieved 83% accuracy, while Naïve Bayes reached 80%. However, Naïve Bayes outperformed in precision, recall, and F1-score with macro averages of 0.59, 0.70, and 0.60, compared to Random Forest at 0.52, 0.55, and 0.54. Based on these results, the choice of the best algorithm depends on the specific needs. If the priority is overall accuracy, Random Forest is more recommended however, if the priority is balanced performance across sentiment classes, Naïve Bayes performs better.
Co-Authors Ariel Mutia Salsabila Putri Wiji Lestari